Pith. Sign in

RECORD

A Computation in a Cellular Automaton Collider Rule 110

PaperPDF from arXiv

data files

Paper breakdownThe authors' claims, conditions and measurements, as JSON Signed receiptProof this review has not been altered
X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit Hacker News
Genaro J. Martinez, Andrew Adamatzky, Harold V. McIntosh

Cellular Automata and Lattice Gases · Submitted 16 Sep 2016

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim We show how a computation can be performed on the collider by exploiting interactions between gliders (particles, localisations).

how it is stated · asserted 1.00 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv ID1609.05240 (version 1)
Pith IDAQKWLJKB, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationAndrew Adamatzky, Genaro J. Martinez, Harold V. McIntosh. "A Computation in a Cellular Automaton Collider Rule 110." arXiv:1609.05240 (2016). https://pith.science/paper/AQKWLJKB
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13.0 via TypeSafe API, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 2,892 input tokens.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.04 · states limitation 0.07 · human participants 0.02 · controlled comparison 0.02 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.03 · compares with prior results 0.08 · mentions code or data availability 0.03.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v1. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

A cellular automaton collider is a finite state machine build of rings of one-dimensional cellular automata. We show how a computation can be performed on the collider by exploiting interactions between gliders (particles, localisations). The constructions proposed are based on universality of elementary cellular automaton rule 110, cyclic tag systems, supercolliders, and computing on rings.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 A cellular automaton collider is a finite state machine build of rings of one-dimensional cellular automata. background 0.98 0.09 0.05 asserted 1.00
s1 We show how a computation can be performed on the collider by exploiting interactions between gliders (particles, localisations). contribution 0.85 0.92 0.75 asserted 1.00
s2 The constructions proposed are based on universality of elementary cellular automaton rule 110, cyclic tag systems, supercolliders, and computing on rings. method 0.76 0.25 0.09 asserted 0.99

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: method or tool 0.66 · evidence from argument 0.43.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v1
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

A cellular automaton collider is a finite state machine build of rings of one-dimensional cellular automata. We show how a computation can be performed on the collider by exploiting interactions between gliders (particles, localisations). The constructions proposed are based on universality of elementary cellular automaton rule 110, cyclic tag systems, supercolliders, and computing on rings.

Human review

How Pith checks papers → · Full audit of this paper →

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.