REVIEW 2 cited by
Enhanced LSTM for Natural Language Inference
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Reasoning and inference are central to human and artificial intelligence. Modeling inference in human language is very challenging. With the availability of large annotated data (Bowman et al., 2015), it has recently become feasible to train neural network based inference models, which have shown to be very effective. In this paper, we present a new state-of-the-art result, achieving the accuracy of 88.6% on the Stanford Natural Language Inference Dataset. Unlike the previous top models that use very complicated network architectures, we first demonstrate that carefully designing sequential inference models based on chain LSTMs can outperform all previous models. Based on this, we further show that by explicitly considering recursive architectures in both local inference modeling and inference composition, we achieve additional improvement. Particularly, incorporating syntactic parsing information contributes to our best result---it further improves the performance even when added to the already very strong model.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Adversarial Text Generation with Dynamic Contextual Perturbation
An NLP attack that swaps gradient-important words with synonyms while minimizing BERT embedding distance is reported to beat PWWS and BERT-Attack on accuracy drop, perturbation rate, and queries, but the paper gives n...
-
Multi-Granularity Reasoning for Natural Language Inference
Stacking element-wise multi-layer BERT interactions and DenseNet yields modest NLI gains over BERT/RoBERTa baselines on standard benchmarks.
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.