Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

Review of multi-fidelity models

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1609.07196 v6 pith:L7WHXBNZ submitted 2016-09-23 stat.AP

classification stat.AP
keywords modelsmulti-fidelityreviewcomputationalfidelityincludingmodelingsurrogate
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Multi-fidelity models provide a framework for integrating computational models of varying complexity, allowing for accurate predictions while optimizing computational resources. These models are especially beneficial when acquiring high-accuracy data is costly or computationally intensive. This review offers a comprehensive analysis of multi-fidelity models, focusing on their applications in scientific and engineering fields, particularly in optimization and uncertainty quantification. It classifies publications on multi-fidelity modeling according to several criteria, including application area, surrogate model selection, types of fidelity, combination methods and year of publication. The study investigates techniques for combining different fidelity levels, with an emphasis on multi-fidelity surrogate models. This work discusses reproducibility, open-sourcing methodologies and benchmarking procedures to promote transparency. The manuscript also includes educational toy problems to enhance understanding. Additionally, this paper outlines best practices for presenting multi-fidelity-related savings in a standardized, succinct and yet thorough manner. The review concludes by examining current trends in multi-fidelity modeling, including emerging techniques, recent advancements, and promising research directions.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Multifidelity-Augmented Gaussian Process Inputs for Surrogate Modeling from Scarce Data

    stat.ML 2026-03 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Augmenting a high-fidelity GP's inputs with predictions from all low-fidelity surrogates improves accuracy and cuts cost versus cokriging and autoregressive multifidelity GPs on scarce-data problems.

  2. Multiport Analytical Pixel Electromagnetic Simulator (MAPES) for AI-assisted RFIC and Microwave Circuit Design

    eess.SP 2025-11 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    MAPES predicts S-parameters of arbitrary pixel-based microwave/RFIC layouts from one precomputed multiport impedance matrix and a pixel-to-load mapping, achieving 600–2000× per-evaluation speedup over CST with mean S-...

  3. Multi-fidelity Bayesian Data-Driven Design of Energy Absorbing Spinodoid Cellular Structures

    cs.LG 2025-07 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    Multi-fidelity Bayesian optimization improves the best-found energy absorption of spinodoid cellular structures by up to 11% compared to single-fidelity Bayesian optimization under an equal computational budget.

Pith tools