Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Fair Representation and a Linear Shapley Rule

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1610.05436 v1 pith:THUJX4MI submitted 2016-10-18 cs.GT

classification cs.GT
keywords fairrepresentationruleshapleycouncillinearpsrrvoters
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

When delegations to an assembly or council represent differently sized constituencies, they are often allocated voting weights which increase in population numbers (EU Council, US Electoral College, etc.). The Penrose square root rule (PSRR) is the main benchmark for fair representation of all bottom-tier voters in the top-tier decision making body, but rests on the restrictive assumption of independent binary decisions. We consider intervals of alternatives with single-peaked preferences instead, and presume positive correlation of local voters. This calls for a replacement of the PSRR by a linear Shapley rule: representation is fair if the Shapley value of the delegates is proportional to their constituency sizes.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools