REVIEW 3 cited by
Naturally Small Dirac Neutrino Mass with Intermediate $SU(2)_{L}$ Multiplet Fields
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
abstract
If neutrinos are Dirac fermions, certain new physics beyond the standard model should exist to account for the smallness of neutrino mass. With two additional scalars and a heavy intermediate fermion, in this paper, we systematically study the general mechanism that can natrally generate the tiny Dirac neutrino mass at tree and in one-loop level. For tree level models, we focus on natural ones, in which the additional scalars develop small vacuum expectation values without fine-tuning. For one-loop level models, we explore those having dark matter candidates under $Z_2^D$ symmetry. In both cases, we concentrate on $SU(2)_L$ multiplet scalars no larger than quintuplet, and derive the complete sets of viable models. Phenomenologies, such as lepton flavor violation, leptogenesis, and LHC signatures are briefly discussed.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
Thermal Leptogenesis in the BNT Model of Neutrino Mass
In the BNT neutrino-mass model, thermal leptogenesis can explain the observed baryon asymmetry with triplet masses above roughly 3.5e7 GeV in the hierarchical case and as low as 1.7 TeV with resonant enhancement.
-
How Charged Can Neutrinos Be?
Mini-charged neutrinos are viable only for flavor-universal U(1)_X extensions such as U(1)_{B-L} and U(1)_L, and their experimental constraints are model-dependent, with upper bounds ranging from 10^-19 e to 10^-21 e.
-
Minimal Dirac seesaw dark matter
A Z4-symmetric Dirac seesaw makes the imaginary part of a seesaw scalar a stable dark matter candidate and links its phenomenology to gravitational wave and CMB observables.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.