Pith. sign in

REVIEW

The Exceptional Flare of Mrk 501 in 2014: Combined Observations with H.E.S.S. and FACT

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1611.03983 v1 pith:OZJRFP5W submitted 2016-11-12 astro-ph.HE

The Exceptional Flare of Mrk 501 in 2014: Combined Observations with H.E.S.S. and FACT

classification astro-ph.HE
keywords factenergiesobservationsallowcompareddatadetectedenergy
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

The BL Lac type object Mrk 501 was observed at very high energies (E > 100 GeV) in 2014 with the upgraded H.E.S.S. (High Energy Stereoscopic System) phase 2 array. The data collected with the central 28m telescope allow for a broader energy range extending to lower energies when compared to the one obtained with the four small telescopes alone. A strong flaring event with a flux level comparable to the 1997 historical maximum has been detected as a consequence of target of opportunity observations triggered by alerts from the FACT collaboration. The First G-APD Cherenkov Telescope (FACT) is continuously monitoring bright blazars at TeV energies providing important pre- and post-flare information. For the first time, the data and lightcurves from H.E.S.S. and FACT are compared. These contemporaneous observations allow for a better characterization of the source emission. In a multiwavelength context, more precise correlation studies between VHE and lower energies are possible thanks to the dense sampling of the FACT observations. The hard intrinsic spectrum detected by H.E.S.S. during the flare allows the derivation of strong constraints on the scale of Lorentz invariance violation via the non-detection of EBL opacity modifications and from time-of-flight studies.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.