REVIEW 1 cited by
Comparative study of histogram distance measures for re-identification
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
Color based re-identification methods usually rely on a distance function to measure the similarity between individuals. In this paper we study the behavior of several histogram distance measures in different color spaces. We wonder whether there is a particular histogram distance measure better than others, likewise also, if there is a color space that present better discrimination features. Several experiments are designed and evaluated in several images to obtain measures against various color spaces. We test in several image databases. A measure ranking is generated to calculate the area under the CMC, this area is the indicator used to evaluate which distance measure and color space present the best performance for the considered databases. Also, other parameters such as the image division in horizontal stripes and number of histogram bins, have been studied.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Robustness Analysis against Adversarial Patch Attacks in Fully Unmanned Stores
Adversarial patches can disrupt YOLOv5 and Faster R-CNN detectors in a simulated unmanned store, with a new histogram loss yielding small success-rate gains.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.