Pith. Sign in

RECORD

The Effect of Galactic Feedback on Gas Accretion and Wind Recycling

Astrophysics of Galaxies · Submitted 2 Dec 2016

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim Wind recycling is found to be an important process that fuels galaxies at late times and the recycled gas has different properties than gas accreting for the first time.

how it is stated · asserted 1.00 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv ID1612.00591 (version 1)
Pith IDRI76SKRK, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
Citation2, (2) ASIAA, 3, (3) HITS, 4) ((1) UC Berkeley, (4) Yale), Freeke van de Voort (1. "The Effect of Galactic Feedback on Gas Accretion and Wind Recycling." arXiv:1612.00591 (2016). https://pith.science/paper/RI76SKRK
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13.0 via TypeSafe API, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 6,184 input tokens.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.02 · states limitation 0.40 · human participants 0.01 · controlled comparison 0.44 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.04 · compares with prior results 0.50 · mentions code or data availability 0.02.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v1. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

In the absence of galactic winds, the rate at which gas accretes onto galaxies is determined by the gravitational potential and by radiative cooling. However, outflows driven by supernovae and active galactic nuclei not only eject gas from galaxies, but also prevent gas from accreting in the first place. Furthermore, gas previously ejected from a galaxy can re-accrete onto (the same or a different) galaxy. Because this gas has a high metallicity, its cooling rate is relatively high, which will increase its chances to re-accrete. This complex interplay between gas inflows and outflows is discussed in this chapter. Wind recycling is found to be an important process that fuels galaxies at late times and the recycled gas has different properties than gas accreting for the first time. Quantitative conclusions, however, vary between studies, because the amount of wind recycling is dependent on the details of the feedback model. We discuss these differences, known caveats, and ways to make progress in understanding how galaxies are fed at low redshift.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 In the absence of galactic winds, the rate at which gas accretes onto galaxies is determined by the gravitational potential and by radiative cooling. background 1.00 0.06 0.03 asserted 1.00
s1 However, outflows driven by supernovae and active galactic nuclei not only eject gas from galaxies, but also prevent gas from accreting in the first place. background 0.96 0.08 0.08 asserted 1.00
s2 Furthermore, gas previously ejected from a galaxy can re-accrete onto (the same or a different) galaxy. background 0.98 0.07 0.04 asserted 0.98
s3 Because this gas has a high metallicity, its cooling rate is relatively high, which will increase its chances to re-accrete. background 0.67 0.11 0.04 asserted 0.76
s4 This complex interplay between gas inflows and outflows is discussed in this chapter. contribution 0.84 0.14 0.03 asserted 0.67
s5 Wind recycling is found to be an important process that fuels galaxies at late times and the recycled gas has different properties than gas accreting for the first time. result 0.96 0.44 0.68 asserted 1.00
s6 Quantitative conclusions, however, vary between studies, because the amount of wind recycling is dependent on the details of the feedback model. limitation 0.38 0.07 0.08 asserted 0.99
s7 We discuss these differences, known caveats, and ways to make progress in understanding how galaxies are fed at low redshift. future work 0.56 0.44 0.05 unclear 0.78

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: review 0.99 · evidence from literature 0.79.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v1
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

In the absence of galactic winds, the rate at which gas accretes onto galaxies is determined by the gravitational potential and by radiative cooling. However, outflows driven by supernovae and active galactic nuclei not only eject gas from galaxies, but also prevent gas from accreting in the first place. Furthermore, gas previously ejected from a galaxy can re-accrete onto (the same or a different) galaxy. Because this gas has a high metallicity, its cooling rate is relatively high, which will increase its chances to re-accrete. This complex interplay between gas inflows and outflows is discussed in this chapter. Wind recycling is found to be an important process that fuels galaxies at late times and the recycled gas has different properties than gas accreting for the first time. Quantitative conclusions, however, vary between studies, because the amount of wind recycling is dependent on the details of the feedback model. We discuss these differences, known caveats, and ways to make progress in understanding how galaxies are fed at low redshift.

Human review
References
How the literature uses it

6 arXiv papers cite this in 6 sentences

Each citing sentence is taken from the citing paper's LaTeX source and typed by Pith's classifier. A label appears at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more; the quoted words are the citing authors'. How each label was checked · JSON

Papers citing it · 3 sentences without a confident label

Cites it as background 3 papers

What it cites · 5 sentences without a confident label

Uses data or values from 1 paper

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.