RECORD
The Effect of Galactic Feedback on Gas Accretion and Wind Recycling
Astrophysics of Galaxies · Submitted 2 Dec 2016
abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review
The authors' main claim Wind recycling is found to be an important process that fuels galaxies at late times and the recycled gas has different properties than gas accreting for the first time.
The compiled record
The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.
Open the compiled record
The abstract, sentence by sentence
In the absence of galactic winds, the rate at which gas accretes onto galaxies is determined by the gravitational potential and by radiative cooling. However, outflows driven by supernovae and active galactic nuclei not only eject gas from galaxies, but also prevent gas from accreting in the first place. Furthermore, gas previously ejected from a galaxy can re-accrete onto (the same or a different) galaxy. Because this gas has a high metallicity, its cooling rate is relatively high, which will increase its chances to re-accrete. This complex interplay between gas inflows and outflows is discussed in this chapter. Wind recycling is found to be an important process that fuels galaxies at late times and the recycled gas has different properties than gas accreting for the first time. Quantitative conclusions, however, vary between studies, because the amount of wind recycling is dependent on the details of the feedback model. We discuss these differences, known caveats, and ways to make progress in understanding how galaxies are fed at low redshift.
background contribution method result interpretation main claim
| # | sentence | role | the authors' own work | states the main conclusion | strength |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| s0 | In the absence of galactic winds, the rate at which gas accretes onto galaxies is determined by the gravitational potential and by radiative cooling. | background 1.00 | 0.06 | 0.03 | asserted 1.00 |
| s1 | However, outflows driven by supernovae and active galactic nuclei not only eject gas from galaxies, but also prevent gas from accreting in the first place. | background 0.96 | 0.08 | 0.08 | asserted 1.00 |
| s2 | Furthermore, gas previously ejected from a galaxy can re-accrete onto (the same or a different) galaxy. | background 0.98 | 0.07 | 0.04 | asserted 0.98 |
| s3 | Because this gas has a high metallicity, its cooling rate is relatively high, which will increase its chances to re-accrete. | background 0.67 | 0.11 | 0.04 | asserted 0.76 |
| s4 | This complex interplay between gas inflows and outflows is discussed in this chapter. | contribution 0.84 | 0.14 | 0.03 | asserted 0.67 |
| s5 | Wind recycling is found to be an important process that fuels galaxies at late times and the recycled gas has different properties than gas accreting for the first time. | result 0.96 | 0.44 | 0.68 | asserted 1.00 |
| s6 | Quantitative conclusions, however, vary between studies, because the amount of wind recycling is dependent on the details of the feedback model. | limitation 0.38 | 0.07 | 0.08 | asserted 0.99 |
| s7 | We discuss these differences, known caveats, and ways to make progress in understanding how galaxies are fed at low redshift. | future work 0.56 | 0.44 | 0.05 | unclear 0.78 |
What was examined, and what was not
- arXiv listing abstract v1
- full text
- figures and tables
- references and citing sentences
- relations to other papers
- P abstract
- S sections
- T body sentences
- C citations
- R cross-paper relations
The paper
Original abstract
In the absence of galactic winds, the rate at which gas accretes onto galaxies is determined by the gravitational potential and by radiative cooling. However, outflows driven by supernovae and active galactic nuclei not only eject gas from galaxies, but also prevent gas from accreting in the first place. Furthermore, gas previously ejected from a galaxy can re-accrete onto (the same or a different) galaxy. Because this gas has a high metallicity, its cooling rate is relatively high, which will increase its chances to re-accrete. This complex interplay between gas inflows and outflows is discussed in this chapter. Wind recycling is found to be an important process that fuels galaxies at late times and the recycled gas has different properties than gas accreting for the first time. Quantitative conclusions, however, vary between studies, because the amount of wind recycling is dependent on the details of the feedback model. We discuss these differences, known caveats, and ways to make progress in understanding how galaxies are fed at low redshift.
Human review
References
How the literature uses it
6 arXiv papers cite this in 6 sentences
Papers citing it · 3 sentences without a confident label
Cites it as background 3 papers
-
Shaped by cosmological gas accretion and energetic feedback, they mediate the transfer of mass, metals, (angular) momentum and energy between large-scale gas reservoirs (the CGM and IGM) and the interstellar medium (ISM) of galaxies [ref] .
Gas accretion and galactic fountain flows in the Auriga cosmological simulations: angular momentum and metal re-distribution · Introduction · 0.93
-
All of these processes, both individually and their interplay together, are an area of active research for hydrodynamical simulations [ref] .
Formation and fate of low metallicity stars in IllustrisTNG50 · Introduction · 0.96
-
While we focus on the origins of the CGM in this paper, we note that there is extensive literature on the origin of gas and stars in galaxies [ref] .
The Origins of the Circumgalactic Medium in the FIRE Simulations · Particle Tracking Results · 1.00
What it cites · 5 sentences without a confident label
Uses data or values from 1 paper
-
Figure [ref] shows a compilation of wind recycling time-scales from the literature [ref] .
The Cosmic Baryon Cycle and Galaxy Mass Assembly in the FIRE Simulations · Discussion and conclusions · 0.92
Discussion
Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.