Pith. Sign in

RECORD

Coin Toss Modeling

Popular Physics · Submitted 17 Dec 2016

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim Unbiased probabilities of heads and tails are obtained for various initial conditions accessible to a usual person.

how it is stated · asserted 1.00 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv ID1612.06705 (version 4)
Pith IDD24ENQDT, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationRazvan C. Stefan, Tiberius O. Cheche. "Coin Toss Modeling." arXiv:1612.06705 (2016). https://pith.science/paper/D24ENQDT
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13.0 via TypeSafe API, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 3,454 input tokens.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.02 · states limitation 0.70 · human participants 0.08 · controlled comparison 0.02 · randomized assignment 0.02 · states quantitative result 0.36 · compares with prior results 0.05 · mentions code or data availability 0.02.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v4. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

The torque-free motion of rigid body in gravitational field is analyzed. The coin lands on a soft surface (such as the palm of the hand) that allows no bouncing. The model assumes the coin as a rigid body with constant angular momentum vector in the body frame, and no air resistance. Unbiased probabilities of heads and tails are obtained for various initial conditions accessible to a usual person.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 The torque-free motion of rigid body in gravitational field is analyzed. contribution 0.53 0.70 0.05 asserted 0.98
s1 The coin lands on a soft surface (such as the palm of the hand) that allows no bouncing. method 0.93 0.27 0.03 asserted 0.98
s2 The model assumes the coin as a rigid body with constant angular momentum vector in the body frame, and no air resistance. method 1.00 0.39 0.05 asserted 0.99
s3 Unbiased probabilities of heads and tails are obtained for various initial conditions accessible to a usual person. result 1.00 0.86 0.83 asserted 1.00

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: theoretical result 1.00 · evidence from proof or derivation 0.98.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v4
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

The torque-free motion of rigid body in gravitational field is analyzed. The coin lands on a soft surface (such as the palm of the hand) that allows no bouncing. The model assumes the coin as a rigid body with constant angular momentum vector in the body frame, and no air resistance. Unbiased probabilities of heads and tails are obtained for various initial conditions accessible to a usual person.

Human review

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.