REVIEW 1 cited by
Median statistics estimates of Hubble and Newton's Constant
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
abstract
Robustness of any statistics depends upon the number of assumptions it makes about the measured data. We point out the advantages of median statistics using toy numerical experiments and demonstrate its robustness, when the number of assumptions we can make about the data are limited. We then apply the median statistics technique to obtain estimates of two constants of nature, Hubble Constant ($H_0$) and Newton's Gravitational Constant($G$), both of which show significant differences between different measurements. For $H_0$, we update the analysis done by Chen and Ratra (2011) and Gott et al. (2001) using $576$ measurements. We find after grouping the different results according to their primary type of measurement, the median estimates are given by $H_0=72.5^{+2.5}_{-8}$ km/sec/Mpc with errors corresponding to 95% c.l. (2$\sigma$) and $G=6.674702^{+0.0014}_{-0.0009} \times 10^{-11} \mathrm{N m^{2}kg^{-2}}$ corresponding to 68% c.l. (1$\sigma$).
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Comparison of $R_h=ct$ and $\Lambda$CDM using DESI DR1 measurements
Using DESI DR1 distance measurements, flat LambdaCDM is decisively preferred over R_h=ct, driven almost entirely by the Lyman-alpha data point at redshift 2.33.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.