Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

Covariate powered cross-weighted multiple testing

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1701.05179 v7 pith:EBYHD6QW submitted 2017-01-18 stat.ME

Covariate powered cross-weighted multiple testing

classification stat.ME
keywords multipletestingcovariateshypothesisp-valuespowercomparedcovariate
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

A fundamental task in the analysis of datasets with many variables is screening for associations. This can be cast as a multiple testing task, where the objective is achieving high detection power while controlling type I error. We consider $m$ hypothesis tests represented by pairs $((P_i, X_i))_{1\leq i \leq m}$ of p-values $P_i$ and covariates $X_i$, such that $P_i \perp X_i$ if $H_i$ is null. Here, we show how to use information potentially available in the covariates about heterogeneities among hypotheses to increase power compared to conventional procedures that only use the $P_i$. To this end, we upgrade existing weighted multiple testing procedures through the Independent Hypothesis Weighting (IHW) framework to use data-driven weights that are calculated as a function of the covariates. Finite sample guarantees, e.g., false discovery rate (FDR) control, are derived from cross-weighting, a data-splitting approach that enables learning the weight-covariate function without overfitting as long as the hypotheses can be partitioned into independent folds, with arbitrary within-fold dependence. IHW has increased power compared to methods that do not use covariate information. A key implication of IHW is that hypothesis rejection in common multiple testing setups should not proceed according to the ranking of the p-values, but by an alternative ranking implied by the covariate-weighted p-values.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. PRADAS: PRior-Assisted DAta Splitting for False Discovery Rate Control

    stat.ME 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    PRADAS derives a Bayes-optimal mirror statistic for any splitting scheme, establishes asymptotic FDR control under weak dependence, and optimizes the split ratio as a stopping time to improve power over standard equal...

  2. Estimating the local false discovery rate under an unknown symmetric null

    stat.ME 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Proposes estimating lfdr via the surrogate density ratio f(-w)/f(w) using logistic regression with natural cubic splines, with asymptotic control if the estimator is consistent.

  3. Weighted Holm Procedures: Theory, Properties, and Recommendations

    stat.ME 2026-04 conditional novelty 5.0

    The weighted Holm procedure (WHP) based on ordered weighted p-values is uniformly more powerful than the weighted alternative Holm procedure (WAP) based on ordered raw p-values, with stronger optimality properties und...