Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Analysis of Unprotected Intersection Left-Turn Conflicts based on Naturalistic Driving Data

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1702.00135 v2 pith:2UR4CMUS submitted 2017-02-01 cs.SY cs.SY

Analysis of Unprotected Intersection Left-Turn Conflicts based on Naturalistic Driving Data

classification cs.SY cs.SY
keywords drivingltapscenariosanalysisbuildconflictsdataleft
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

Analyzing and reconstructing driving scenarios is crucial for testing and evaluating automated vehicles. This research analyzed left turn / straight-driving conflicts at unprotected intersections by extracting actual vehicle motion data from a naturalistic driving database collected by the University of Michigan. Nearly 7,000 Left turn across path opposite direction (LTAP/OD) events involving heavy trucks and light vehicles were extracted and used to build a stochastic model of such LTAP/OD scenarios. Statistical analysis showed that vehicle type is a significant factor, whereas the change of season seems to have limited influence on the statistical nature of the conflict. The results can be used to build HAV testing environments to simulate the LTAP/OD crash cases in a stochastic manner, which is among the top NHTSA identified priority light-vehicle pre-crash scenarios.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.