Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Multi-step Off-policy Learning Without Importance Sampling Ratios

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1702.03006 v1 pith:XE7YEKW2 submitted 2017-02-09 cs.LG

classification cs.LG
keywords algorithmimportanceoff-policyratiossamplinglearningaction-dependentbootstrapping
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

To estimate the value functions of policies from exploratory data, most model-free off-policy algorithms rely on importance sampling, where the use of importance sampling ratios often leads to estimates with severe variance. It is thus desirable to learn off-policy without using the ratios. However, such an algorithm does not exist for multi-step learning with function approximation. In this paper, we introduce the first such algorithm based on temporal-difference (TD) learning updates. We show that an explicit use of importance sampling ratios can be eliminated by varying the amount of bootstrapping in TD updates in an action-dependent manner. Our new algorithm achieves stability using a two-timescale gradient-based TD update. A prior algorithm based on lookup table representation called Tree Backup can also be retrieved using action-dependent bootstrapping, becoming a special case of our algorithm. In two challenging off-policy tasks, we demonstrate that our algorithm is stable, effectively avoids the large variance issue, and can perform substantially better than its state-of-the-art counterpart.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. A Comprehensive Survey of Reinforcement Learning: From Algorithms to Practical Challenges

    cs.AI 2024-11 conditional novelty 2.0 of 10

    A comprehensive but flawed survey of RL algorithms that catalogs many methods and applications without rigorous comparative analysis.

Pith tools