Pith. Sign in

RECORD

Estimation of Risk Contributions with MCMC

Risk Management · Submitted 10 Feb 2017

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim Our numerical experiments based on simulation and real-world data demonstrate that in various risk models, even those having high-dimensional (approximately 500) inhomogeneous margins, our MH estimator has smaller bias and mean squared error compared with existing estimators.

how it is stated · asserted 1.00 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv ID1702.03098 (version 2)
Pith ID4THKEY4I, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationMihoko Minami, Takaaki Koike. "Estimation of Risk Contributions with MCMC." arXiv:1702.03098 (2017). https://pith.science/paper/4THKEY4I
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13.0 via TypeSafe API, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 6,165 input tokens.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.07 · states limitation 0.13 · human participants 0.02 · controlled comparison 0.51 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.76 · compares with prior results 0.97 · mentions code or data availability 0.02.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v2. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

Determining risk contributions of unit exposures to portfolio-wide economic capital is an important task in financial risk management. Computing risk contributions involves difficulties caused by rare-event simulations. In this study, we address the problem of estimating risk contributions when the total risk is measured by value-at-risk (VaR). Our proposed estimator of VaR contributions is based on the Metropolis-Hasting (MH) algorithm, which is one of the most prevalent Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) methods. Unlike existing estimators, our MH-based estimator consists of samples from conditional loss distribution given a rare event of interest. This feature enhances sample efficiency compared with the crude Monte Carlo method. Moreover, our method has the consistency and asymptotic normality, and is widely applicable to various risk models having joint loss density. Our numerical experiments based on simulation and real-world data demonstrate that in various risk models, even those having high-dimensional (approximately 500) inhomogeneous margins, our MH estimator has smaller bias and mean squared error compared with existing estimators.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 Determining risk contributions of unit exposures to portfolio-wide economic capital is an important task in financial risk management. background 1.00 0.04 0.02 asserted 1.00
s1 Computing risk contributions involves difficulties caused by rare-event simulations. background 0.94 0.06 0.02 asserted 1.00
s2 In this study, we address the problem of estimating risk contributions when the total risk is measured by value-at-risk (VaR). contribution 0.71 0.49 0.05 asserted 0.97
s3 Our proposed estimator of VaR contributions is based on the Metropolis-Hasting (MH) algorithm, which is one of the most prevalent Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) methods. method 0.88 0.82 0.07 asserted 1.00
s4 Unlike existing estimators, our MH-based estimator consists of samples from conditional loss distribution given a rare event of interest. contribution 0.59 0.89 0.12 asserted 1.00
s5 This feature enhances sample efficiency compared with the crude Monte Carlo method. result 0.42 0.70 0.10 asserted 0.99
s6 Moreover, our method has the consistency and asymptotic normality, and is widely applicable to various risk models having joint loss density. contribution 0.58 0.78 0.19 asserted 1.00
s7 Our numerical experiments based on simulation and real-world data demonstrate that in various risk models, even those having high-dimensional (approximately 500) inhomogeneous margins, our MH estimator has smaller bias and mean squared error compared with existing estimators. result 1.00 0.97 0.76 asserted 1.00

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: method or tool 1.00 · evidence from simulation or computation 0.99.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v2
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

Determining risk contributions of unit exposures to portfolio-wide economic capital is an important task in financial risk management. Computing risk contributions involves difficulties caused by rare-event simulations. In this study, we address the problem of estimating risk contributions when the total risk is measured by value-at-risk (VaR). Our proposed estimator of VaR contributions is based on the Metropolis-Hasting (MH) algorithm, which is one of the most prevalent Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) methods. Unlike existing estimators, our MH-based estimator consists of samples from conditional loss distribution given a rare event of interest. This feature enhances sample efficiency compared with the crude Monte Carlo method. Moreover, our method has the consistency and asymptotic normality, and is widely applicable to various risk models having joint loss density. Our numerical experiments based on simulation and real-world data demonstrate that in various risk models, even those having high-dimensional (approximately 500) inhomogeneous margins, our MH estimator has smaller bias and mean squared error compared with existing estimators.

Human review

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.