Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Robustness to Adversarial Examples through an Ensemble of Specialists

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1702.06856 v3 pith:L7W4FMT4 submitted 2017-02-22 cs.NE cs.LG

classification cs.NEcs.LG
keywords adversarialensemblespecialistsexamplesinstancesableaccordingadversaries
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

We are proposing to use an ensemble of diverse specialists, where speciality is defined according to the confusion matrix. Indeed, we observed that for adversarial instances originating from a given class, labeling tend to be done into a small subset of (incorrect) classes. Therefore, we argue that an ensemble of specialists should be better able to identify and reject fooling instances, with a high entropy (i.e., disagreement) over the decisions in the presence of adversaries. Experimental results obtained confirm that interpretation, opening a way to make the system more robust to adversarial examples through a rejection mechanism, rather than trying to classify them properly at any cost.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Evaluating the Robustness of the "Ensemble Everything Everywhere" Defense

    cs.LG 2024-11 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Adaptive attacks reduce the robust accuracy of the 'Ensemble Everything Everywhere' defense to 11% on CIFAR-10 and 14% on CIFAR-100 under an l-infinity bound of 8/255.

Pith tools