Pith. Sign in

RECORD

The best fit for the observed galaxy Counts-in-Cell distribution function

Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics · Submitted 3 Mar 2017

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim We show that the best fit for the Counts-in-Cells distribution function is provided by the Negative Binomial distribution.

how it is stated · asserted 1.00 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv ID1703.01087 (version 2)
Pith ID3LKSWVCM, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationC. Pareja-Flores, Ll. Hurtado-Gil, M. J. Pons-Border\'ia, P. Arnalte-Mur, S. Paredes, V. J. Mart\'inez. "The best fit for the observed galaxy Counts-in-Cell distribution function." arXiv:1703.01087 (2017). https://pith.science/paper/3LKSWVCM
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13.0 via TypeSafe API, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 8,283 input tokens.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.62 · states limitation 0.28 · human participants 0.01 · controlled comparison 0.09 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.11 · compares with prior results 0.87 · mentions code or data availability 0.02.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v2. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

The Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS) is the first dense redshift survey encompassing a volume large enough to find the best analytic probability density function that fits the galaxy Counts-in-Cells distribution $f_V(N)$, the frequency distribution of galaxy counts in a volume $V$. Different analytic functions have been previously proposed that can account for some of the observed features of the observed frequency counts, but fail to provide an overall good fit to this important statistical descriptor of the galaxy large-scale distribution. Our goal is to find the probability density function that better fits the observed Counts-in-Cells distribution $f_V(N)$. We have made a systematic study of this function applied to several samples drawn from the SDSS. We show the effective ways to deal with incompleteness of the sample (masked data) in the calculation of $f_V(N)$. We use LasDamas simulations to estimate the errors in the calculation. We test four different distribution functions to find the best fit: the Gravitational Quasi-Equilibrium distribution, the Negative Binomial Distribution, the Log Normal distribution and the Log Normal Distribution including a bias parameter. In the two latter cases, we apply a shot-noise correction to the distributions assuming the local Poisson model. We show that the best fit for the Counts-in-Cells distribution function is provided by the Negative Binomial distribution. In addition, at large scales the Log Normal distribution modified with the inclusion of the bias term also performs a satisfactory fit of the empirical values of $f_V(N)$. Our results demonstrate that the inclusion of a bias term in the Log Normal distribution is necessary to fit the observed galaxy Count-in-Cells distribution function.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 The Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS) is the first dense redshift survey encompassing a volume large enough to find the best analytic probability density function that fits the galaxy Counts-in-Cells distribution $f_V(N)$, the frequency distribution of galaxy counts in a volume $V$. background 0.92 0.21 0.03 asserted 1.00
s1 Different analytic functions have been previously proposed that can account for some of the observed features of the observed frequency counts, but fail to provide an overall good fit to this important statistical descriptor of the galaxy large-scale distribution. gap 0.61 0.05 0.02 asserted 0.99
s2 Our goal is to find the probability density function that better fits the observed Counts-in-Cells distribution $f_V(N)$. contribution 0.76 0.22 0.03 asserted 0.80
s3 We have made a systematic study of this function applied to several samples drawn from the SDSS. contribution 0.70 0.95 0.02 asserted 0.97
s4 We show the effective ways to deal with incompleteness of the sample (masked data) in the calculation of $f_V(N)$. method 0.95 0.90 0.02 asserted 1.00
s5 We use LasDamas simulations to estimate the errors in the calculation. method 1.00 0.91 0.02 asserted 0.99
s6 We test four different distribution functions to find the best fit: the Gravitational Quasi-Equilibrium distribution, the Negative Binomial Distribution, the Log Normal distribution and the Log Normal Distribution including a bias parameter. method 0.95 0.90 0.04 asserted 0.89
s7 In the two latter cases, we apply a shot-noise correction to the distributions assuming the local Poisson model. method 1.00 0.88 0.02 asserted 0.97
s8 We show that the best fit for the Counts-in-Cells distribution function is provided by the Negative Binomial distribution. result 1.00 0.96 0.91 asserted 1.00
s9 In addition, at large scales the Log Normal distribution modified with the inclusion of the bias term also performs a satisfactory fit of the empirical values of $f_V(N)$. result 1.00 0.91 0.07 asserted 0.92
s10 Our results demonstrate that the inclusion of a bias term in the Log Normal distribution is necessary to fit the observed galaxy Count-in-Cells distribution function. interpretation 0.71 0.89 0.25 asserted 1.00

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: empirical study 0.97 · evidence from analysis of existing data 1.00.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v2
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

The Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS) is the first dense redshift survey encompassing a volume large enough to find the best analytic probability density function that fits the galaxy Counts-in-Cells distribution $f_V(N)$, the frequency distribution of galaxy counts in a volume $V$. Different analytic functions have been previously proposed that can account for some of the observed features of the observed frequency counts, but fail to provide an overall good fit to this important statistical descriptor of the galaxy large-scale distribution. Our goal is to find the probability density function that better fits the observed Counts-in-Cells distribution $f_V(N)$. We have made a systematic study of this function applied to several samples drawn from the SDSS. We show the effective ways to deal with incompleteness of the sample (masked data) in the calculation of $f_V(N)$. We use LasDamas simulations to estimate the errors in the calculation. We test four different distribution functions to find the best fit: the Gravitational Quasi-Equilibrium distribution, the Negative Binomial Distribution, the Log Normal distribution and the Log Normal Distribution including a bias parameter. In the two latter cases, we apply a shot-noise correction to the distributions assuming the local Poisson model. We show that the best fit for the Counts-in-Cells distribution function is provided by the Negative Binomial distribution. In addition, at large scales the Log Normal distribution modified with the inclusion of the bias term also performs a satisfactory fit of the empirical values of $f_V(N)$. Our results demonstrate that the inclusion of a bias term in the Log Normal distribution is necessary to fit the observed galaxy Count-in-Cells distribution function.

Human review
References
How the literature uses it

9 arXiv papers cite this in 15 sentences

Each citing sentence is taken from the citing paper's LaTeX source and typed by Pith's classifier. A label appears at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more; the quoted words are the citing authors'. How each label was checked · JSON

Papers citing it · 9 sentences without a confident label

Uses its data or values 1 paper
Cites it as support 1 paper
  • For $b > 1$, $δ_b$ can have downward fluctuations of up to $-b$, which are clearly unphysical; however, $𝒫_LN^b$ has been shown to be a reasonable fit to data [ref] , and we are once again using the PDF only as a way of capturing systematic uncertainties.

    Modeling Dark Photon Oscillations in Our Inhomogeneous Universe · Log-normal PDF with bias · 0.97

Cites it as background 3 papers

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.