REVIEW 1 cited by
The Early Scientific Contributions of J. Robert Oppenheimer: Why Did the Scientific Community Miss the Black Hole Opportunity?
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
We aim to carry out an assessment of the scientific value of Oppenheimer's research on black holes in order to determine and weigh possible factors to explain its neglect by the scientific community, and even by Oppenheimer himself. Dealing primarily with the science and looking closely at the scientific culture and the scientific conceptual belief system of the 1930s, the present article seeks to supplement the existent literature on the subject by enriching the explanations and possibly complicating the guiding questions. We suggest a rereading of Oppenheimer as a more intriguing, ahead-of-his-time figure.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Statistical mechanics of self-gravitating systems in general relativity: I. The quantum Fermi gas
Maximizing entropy at fixed mass-energy and particle number in general relativity yields the Tolman-Oppenheimer-Volkoff equations and the Tolman-Klein relations for a Fermi gas, for any convex form of entropy.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.