REVIEW 2 cited by
Generating Multi-label Discrete Patient Records using Generative Adversarial Networks
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Access to electronic health record (EHR) data has motivated computational advances in medical research. However, various concerns, particularly over privacy, can limit access to and collaborative use of EHR data. Sharing synthetic EHR data could mitigate risk. In this paper, we propose a new approach, medical Generative Adversarial Network (medGAN), to generate realistic synthetic patient records. Based on input real patient records, medGAN can generate high-dimensional discrete variables (e.g., binary and count features) via a combination of an autoencoder and generative adversarial networks. We also propose minibatch averaging to efficiently avoid mode collapse, and increase the learning efficiency with batch normalization and shortcut connections. To demonstrate feasibility, we showed that medGAN generates synthetic patient records that achieve comparable performance to real data on many experiments including distribution statistics, predictive modeling tasks and a medical expert review. We also empirically observe a limited privacy risk in both identity and attribute disclosure using medGAN.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
SYNRARE: Synthetic Rare Disease EHR Generation for ML Benchmarking
SYNRARE is a no-code GUI over Synthea that globally perturbs disease-module distributions and BMI effects to generate controllable rare-disease-like synthetic EHR cohorts for ML benchmarking.
-
A Review of Privacy Metrics for Privacy-Preserving Synthetic Data Generation
A review that lists 17 privacy metrics for synthetic data with their formulas and assumptions, rescaling each to a common privacy-risk direction.
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.