Pith. Sign in

RECORD

Information-theoretic Model Identification and Policy Search using Physics Engines with Application to Robotic Manipulation

Robotics · Submitted 22 Mar 2017

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim Experimental results both in simulation and using a real robot indicate that the proposed method outperforms state-of-the-art model-free reinforcement learning approaches.

how it is stated · asserted 0.57 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv ID1703.07822 (version 1)
Pith IDQ22VD3N3, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationAbdeslam Boularias, Andrew Kimmel, Shaojun Zhu. "Information-theoretic Model Identification and Policy Search using Physics Engines with Application to Robotic Manipulation." arXiv:1703.07822 (2017). https://pith.science/paper/Q22VD3N3
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13.0 via TypeSafe API, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 4,281 input tokens.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.04 · states limitation 0.06 · human participants 0.02 · controlled comparison 0.78 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.05 · compares with prior results 0.96 · mentions code or data availability 0.02.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v1. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

We consider the problem of a robot learning the mechanical properties of objects through physical interaction with the object, and introduce a practical, data-efficient approach for identifying the motion models of these objects. The proposed method utilizes a physics engine, where the robot seeks to identify the inertial and friction parameters of the object by simulating its motion under different values of the parameters and identifying those that result in a simulation which matches the observed real motions. The problem is solved in a Bayesian optimization framework. The same framework is used for both identifying the model of an object online and searching for a policy that would minimize a given cost function according to the identified model. Experimental results both in simulation and using a real robot indicate that the proposed method outperforms state-of-the-art model-free reinforcement learning approaches.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 We consider the problem of a robot learning the mechanical properties of objects through physical interaction with the object, and introduce a practical, data-efficient approach for identifying the motion models of these objects. contribution 0.79 0.72 0.06 asserted 0.95
s1 The proposed method utilizes a physics engine, where the robot seeks to identify the inertial and friction parameters of the object by simulating its motion under different values of the parameters and identifying those that result in a simulation which matches the observed real motions. method 1.00 0.75 0.04 asserted 1.00
s2 The problem is solved in a Bayesian optimization framework. method 1.00 0.71 0.03 asserted 1.00
s3 The same framework is used for both identifying the model of an object online and searching for a policy that would minimize a given cost function according to the identified model. method 0.69 0.84 0.08 asserted 1.00
s4 Experimental results both in simulation and using a real robot indicate that the proposed method outperforms state-of-the-art model-free reinforcement learning approaches. result 1.00 0.95 0.82 asserted 0.57

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: method or tool 1.00 · evidence from observation or experiment 0.93.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v1
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

We consider the problem of a robot learning the mechanical properties of objects through physical interaction with the object, and introduce a practical, data-efficient approach for identifying the motion models of these objects. The proposed method utilizes a physics engine, where the robot seeks to identify the inertial and friction parameters of the object by simulating its motion under different values of the parameters and identifying those that result in a simulation which matches the observed real motions. The problem is solved in a Bayesian optimization framework. The same framework is used for both identifying the model of an object online and searching for a policy that would minimize a given cost function according to the identified model. Experimental results both in simulation and using a real robot indicate that the proposed method outperforms state-of-the-art model-free reinforcement learning approaches.

Human review
How the literature uses it

2 arXiv papers cite this in 2 sentences

Each citing sentence is taken from the citing paper's LaTeX source and typed by Pith's classifier. A label appears at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more; the quoted words are the citing authors'. How each label was checked · JSON

Papers citing it · 1 sentence without a confident label

Cites it as background 1 paper

What it cites

Uses data or values from 1 paper

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.