RECORD
On the optimal control of non-expansive or passive systems
Systems and Control · Submitted 23 Mar 2017
abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review
The authors' main claim In this paper, we solve these optimal control problems without making any assumptions.
The compiled record
The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.
Open the compiled record
The abstract, sentence by sentence
The positive-real and bounded-real lemmas solve two important linear-quadratic optimal control problems for passive and non-expansive systems, respectively. The lemmas assume controllability, yet a passive or non-expansive system can be uncontrollable. In this paper, we solve these optimal control problems without making any assumptions. In particular, we show how to extract the greatest possible amount of energy from a passive but not necessarily controllable system (e.g., a passive electric circuit) using state feedback. A complete characterisation of the set of solutions to the linear matrix inequalities in the positive-real and bounded-real lemmas is also obtained. In addition, we obtain necessary and sufficient conditions for a system to be non-expansive that augment the bounded-real condition with new conditions relevant to uncontrollable systems.
background contribution method result interpretation main claim
| # | sentence | role | the authors' own work | states the main conclusion | strength |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| s0 | The positive-real and bounded-real lemmas solve two important linear-quadratic optimal control problems for passive and non-expansive systems, respectively. | background 1.00 | 0.05 | 0.05 | asserted 1.00 |
| s1 | The lemmas assume controllability, yet a passive or non-expansive system can be uncontrollable. | gap 0.75 | 0.07 | 0.04 | asserted 0.98 |
| s2 | In this paper, we solve these optimal control problems without making any assumptions. | contribution 0.99 | 0.95 | 0.67 | asserted 1.00 |
| s3 | In particular, we show how to extract the greatest possible amount of energy from a passive but not necessarily controllable system (e.g., a passive electric circuit) using state feedback. | contribution 0.58 | 0.92 | 0.24 | asserted 1.00 |
| s4 | A complete characterisation of the set of solutions to the linear matrix inequalities in the positive-real and bounded-real lemmas is also obtained. | result 0.71 | 0.95 | 0.12 | asserted 1.00 |
| s5 | In addition, we obtain necessary and sufficient conditions for a system to be non-expansive that augment the bounded-real condition with new conditions relevant to uncontrollable systems. | result 0.74 | 0.96 | 0.14 | asserted 1.00 |
What was examined, and what was not
- arXiv listing abstract v2
- full text
- figures and tables
- references and citing sentences
- relations to other papers
- P abstract
- S sections
- T body sentences
- C citations
- R cross-paper relations
The paper
Original abstract
The positive-real and bounded-real lemmas solve two important linear-quadratic optimal control problems for passive and non-expansive systems, respectively. The lemmas assume controllability, yet a passive or non-expansive system can be uncontrollable. In this paper, we solve these optimal control problems without making any assumptions. In particular, we show how to extract the greatest possible amount of energy from a passive but not necessarily controllable system (e.g., a passive electric circuit) using state feedback. A complete characterisation of the set of solutions to the linear matrix inequalities in the positive-real and bounded-real lemmas is also obtained. In addition, we obtain necessary and sufficient conditions for a system to be non-expansive that augment the bounded-real condition with new conditions relevant to uncontrollable systems.
Human review
How the literature uses it
1 arXiv paper cite this in 1 sentence
Discussion
Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.