RECORD
Prediction of infectious disease epidemics via weighted density ensembles
Machine Learning · Submitted 31 Mar 2017
abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review
The authors' main claim Ensemble methods offer the potential to deliver more reliable predictions to public health decision makers.
The compiled record
The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.
Open the compiled record
The abstract, sentence by sentence
Accurate and reliable predictions of infectious disease dynamics can be valuable to public health organizations that plan interventions to decrease or prevent disease transmission. A great variety of models have been developed for this task, using different model structures, covariates, and targets for prediction. Experience has shown that the performance of these models varies; some tend to do better or worse in different seasons or at different points within a season. Ensemble methods combine multiple models to obtain a single prediction that leverages the strengths of each model. We considered a range of ensemble methods that each form a predictive density for a target of interest as a weighted sum of the predictive densities from component models. In the simplest case, equal weight is assigned to each component model; in the most complex case, the weights vary with the region, prediction target, week of the season when the predictions are made, a measure of component model uncertainty, and recent observations of disease incidence. We applied these methods to predict measures of influenza season timing and severity in the United States, both at the national and regional levels, using three component models. We trained the models on retrospective predictions from 14 seasons (1997/1998 - 2010/2011) and evaluated each model's prospective, out-of-sample performance in the five subsequent influenza seasons. In this test phase, the ensemble methods showed overall performance that was similar to the best of the component models, but offered more consistent performance across seasons than the component models. Ensemble methods offer the potential to deliver more reliable predictions to public health decision makers.
background contribution method result interpretation main claim
| # | sentence | role | the authors' own work | states the main conclusion | strength |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| s0 | Accurate and reliable predictions of infectious disease dynamics can be valuable to public health organizations that plan interventions to decrease or prevent disease transmission. | background 1.00 | 0.04 | 0.04 | asserted 0.56 |
| s1 | A great variety of models have been developed for this task, using different model structures, covariates, and targets for prediction. | background 1.00 | 0.04 | 0.02 | asserted 1.00 |
| s2 | Experience has shown that the performance of these models varies; some tend to do better or worse in different seasons or at different points within a season. | background 0.99 | 0.09 | 0.02 | asserted 0.99 |
| s3 | Ensemble methods combine multiple models to obtain a single prediction that leverages the strengths of each model. | background 0.96 | 0.04 | 0.03 | asserted 1.00 |
| s4 | We considered a range of ensemble methods that each form a predictive density for a target of interest as a weighted sum of the predictive densities from component models. | method 0.78 | 0.81 | 0.04 | asserted 0.95 |
| s5 | In the simplest case, equal weight is assigned to each component model; in the most complex case, the weights vary with the region, prediction target, week of the season when the predictions are made, a measure of component model uncertainty, and recent observations of disease incidence. | method 0.97 | 0.23 | 0.05 | asserted 0.98 |
| s6 | We applied these methods to predict measures of influenza season timing and severity in the United States, both at the national and regional levels, using three component models. | method 0.83 | 0.97 | 0.03 | asserted 0.96 |
| s7 | We trained the models on retrospective predictions from 14 seasons (1997/1998 - 2010/2011) and evaluated each model's prospective, out-of-sample performance in the five subsequent influenza seasons. | method 0.99 | 0.97 | 0.04 | asserted 0.94 |
| s8 | In this test phase, the ensemble methods showed overall performance that was similar to the best of the component models, but offered more consistent performance across seasons than the component models. | result 1.00 | 0.96 | 0.58 | asserted 1.00 |
| s9 | Ensemble methods offer the potential to deliver more reliable predictions to public health decision makers. | interpretation 1.00 | 0.24 | 0.81 | hedged possibility 0.99 |
What was examined, and what was not
- arXiv listing abstract v1
- full text
- figures and tables
- references and citing sentences
- relations to other papers
- P abstract
- S sections
- T body sentences
- C citations
- R cross-paper relations
The paper
Original abstract
Accurate and reliable predictions of infectious disease dynamics can be valuable to public health organizations that plan interventions to decrease or prevent disease transmission. A great variety of models have been developed for this task, using different model structures, covariates, and targets for prediction. Experience has shown that the performance of these models varies; some tend to do better or worse in different seasons or at different points within a season. Ensemble methods combine multiple models to obtain a single prediction that leverages the strengths of each model. We considered a range of ensemble methods that each form a predictive density for a target of interest as a weighted sum of the predictive densities from component models. In the simplest case, equal weight is assigned to each component model; in the most complex case, the weights vary with the region, prediction target, week of the season when the predictions are made, a measure of component model uncertainty, and recent observations of disease incidence. We applied these methods to predict measures of influenza season timing and severity in the United States, both at the national and regional levels, using three component models. We trained the models on retrospective predictions from 14 seasons (1997/1998 - 2010/2011) and evaluated each model's prospective, out-of-sample performance in the five subsequent influenza seasons. In this test phase, the ensemble methods showed overall performance that was similar to the best of the component models, but offered more consistent performance across seasons than the component models. Ensemble methods offer the potential to deliver more reliable predictions to public health decision makers.
Human review
How the literature uses it
1 arXiv paper cite this in 1 sentence
Discussion
Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.