Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Quantifying Search Bias: Investigating Sources of Bias for Political Searches in Social Media

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1704.01347 v1 pith:EZ4ZADWO submitted 2017-04-05 cs.SI cs.CYcs.HC

classification cs.SIcs.CYcs.HC
keywords biassearchmediapoliticalrankingsocialsystemarises
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Search systems in online social media sites are frequently used to find information about ongoing events and people. For topics with multiple competing perspectives, such as political events or political candidates, bias in the top ranked results significantly shapes public opinion. However, bias does not emerge from an algorithm alone. It is important to distinguish between the bias that arises from the data that serves as the input to the ranking system and the bias that arises from the ranking system itself. In this paper, we propose a framework to quantify these distinct biases and apply this framework to politics-related queries on Twitter. We found that both the input data and the ranking system contribute significantly to produce varying amounts of bias in the search results and in different ways. We discuss the consequences of these biases and possible mechanisms to signal this bias in social media search systems' interfaces.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Modeling Ranking Properties with In-Context Learning

    cs.IR 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    In-context examples that encode a target distribution over document attributes can steer LLM rerankers toward fairness and diversity while roughly preserving relevance on four IR benchmarks.

Pith tools