REVIEW 2 cited by
Oversights in the Respective Theorems of von Neumann and Bell are Homologous
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
abstract
We show that the respective oversights in the von Neumann's general theorem against all hidden variable theories and Bell's theorem against their local-realistic counterparts are homologous. Both theorems unjustifiably assume the additivity of expectation values within hidden variable theories to derive their respective conclusions. However, for non-commuting observables, the equivalence of a sum of expectation values and the expectation value of the sum of measurement results, although respected within quantum mechanics, need not hold for hidden variable theories, regardless of specific characteristics such as local realism they may respect. Once this oversight is ameliorated from Bell's argument and local realism is implemented correctly, the bounds on the CHSH correlator work out to be ${\pm2\sqrt{2}}$ instead of ${\pm2}$, thereby mitigating the conclusion of Bell's theorem. Consequently, what is ruled out by the Bell-test experiments is not local realism but the additivity of expectation values.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Conditional probabilities in quantum-optical settings
Conditioning on one outcome of a joint noisy measurement can reduce (even eliminate) uncertainty in a complementary variable, and the resulting conditional distribution generally has no Born-rule representation via th...
-
Generalized measurements for Bell tests in different probability spaces
One experimental arrangement with four detectors per photon implements two distinct probability spaces for Bell tests, and yields new conditional-probability Bell inequalities.
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.