Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Where and when: optimal scheduling of the electromagnetic follow-up of gravitational-wave events based on counterpart lightcurve models

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1704.05851 v3 pith:N7DXDMS4 submitted 2017-04-19 astro-ph.HE

Where and when: optimal scheduling of the electromagnetic follow-up of gravitational-wave events based on counterpart lightcurve models

classification astro-ph.HE
keywords constructdetectabilitysignalafterglowbinarycounterpartelectromagneticfollow-up
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

The electromagnetic (EM) follow-up of a gravitational wave (GW) event requires to scan a wide sky region, defined by the so called "skymap", for the detection and identification of a transient counterpart. We propose a novel method that exploits information encoded in the GW signal to construct a "detectability map", which represents the time-dependent ("when") probability to detect the transient at each position of the skymap ("where"). Focusing on the case of a neutron star binary inspiral, we model the associated short gamma-ray burst afterglow and macronova emission, using the probability distributions of binary parameters (sky position, distance, orbit inclination, mass ratio) extracted from the GW signal as inputs. The resulting family of possible lightcurves is the basis to construct the detectability map. As a practical example, we apply the method to a simulated GW signal produced by a neutron star merger at 75 Mpc whose localization uncertainty is very large (about 1500 square degrees). We construct observing strategies based on the detectability maps for optical, infrared and radio facilities, taking VST, VISTA and MeerKAT as prototypes. Assuming limiting fluxes of r ~ 24.5, J ~ 22.4 (AB magnitudes) and 500 uJy @ 1.4 GHz for ~ 1000 s of exposure each, the afterglow and macronova emissions are successfully detected with a minimum observing time of 7, 15 and 5 hours respectively.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.