Pith. Sign in

RECORD

Goldberg, Fuller, Caspar, Klug and Coxeter and a general approach to local symmetry-preserving operations

Combinatorics · Submitted 8 May 2017

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim We will sketch the different approaches and generalize Goldberg's approach to a systematic one encompassing all local symmetry-preserving operations on polyhedra.

how it is stated · asserted 0.83 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv ID1705.02848 (version 1)
Pith IDLIBR6DB2, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationGunnar Brinkmann, Pieter Goetschalckx, Stan Schein. "Goldberg, Fuller, Caspar, Klug and Coxeter and a general approach to local symmetry-preserving operations." arXiv:1705.02848 (2017). https://pith.science/paper/LIBR6DB2
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13.0 via TypeSafe API, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 6,879 input tokens.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.12 · states limitation 0.10 · human participants 0.02 · controlled comparison 0.02 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.05 · compares with prior results 0.93 · mentions code or data availability 0.02.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v1. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

Cubic polyhedra with icosahedral symmetry where all faces are pentagons or hexagons have been studied in chemistry and biology as well as mathematics. In chemistry one of these is buckminsterfullerene, a pure carbon cage with maximal symmetry, whereas in biology they describe the structure of spherical viruses. Parameterized operations to construct all such polyhedra were first described by Goldberg in 1937 in a mathematical context and later by Caspar and Klug -- not knowing about Goldberg's work -- in 1962 in a biological context. In the meantime Buckminster Fuller also used subdivided icosahedral structures for the construction of his geodesic domes. In 1971 Coxeter published a survey article that refers to these constructions. Subsequently, the literature often refers to the Goldberg-Coxeter construction. This construction is actually that of Caspar and Klug. Moreover, there are essential differences between this (Caspar/Klug/Coxeter) approach and the approaches of Fuller and of Goldberg. We will sketch the different approaches and generalize Goldberg's approach to a systematic one encompassing all local symmetry-preserving operations on polyhedra.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 Cubic polyhedra with icosahedral symmetry where all faces are pentagons or hexagons have been studied in chemistry and biology as well as mathematics. background 1.00 0.04 0.02 asserted 1.00
s1 In chemistry one of these is buckminsterfullerene, a pure carbon cage with maximal symmetry, whereas in biology they describe the structure of spherical viruses. background 1.00 0.04 0.02 asserted 1.00
s2 Parameterized operations to construct all such polyhedra were first described by Goldberg in 1937 in a mathematical context and later by Caspar and Klug -- not knowing about Goldberg's work -- in 1962 in a biological context. background 1.00 0.03 0.04 asserted 1.00
s3 In the meantime Buckminster Fuller also used subdivided icosahedral structures for the construction of his geodesic domes. background 1.00 0.03 0.02 asserted 1.00
s4 In 1971 Coxeter published a survey article that refers to these constructions. background 1.00 0.03 0.02 asserted 1.00
s5 Subsequently, the literature often refers to the Goldberg-Coxeter construction. background 0.98 0.05 0.04 asserted 0.99
s6 This construction is actually that of Caspar and Klug. result 0.55 0.28 0.23 asserted 1.00
s7 Moreover, there are essential differences between this (Caspar/Klug/Coxeter) approach and the approaches of Fuller and of Goldberg. result 0.46 0.42 0.19 asserted 1.00
s8 We will sketch the different approaches and generalize Goldberg's approach to a systematic one encompassing all local symmetry-preserving operations on polyhedra. contribution 1.00 0.81 0.47 asserted 0.83

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: method or tool 0.71 · evidence from literature 0.82.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v1
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

Cubic polyhedra with icosahedral symmetry where all faces are pentagons or hexagons have been studied in chemistry and biology as well as mathematics. In chemistry one of these is buckminsterfullerene, a pure carbon cage with maximal symmetry, whereas in biology they describe the structure of spherical viruses. Parameterized operations to construct all such polyhedra were first described by Goldberg in 1937 in a mathematical context and later by Caspar and Klug -- not knowing about Goldberg's work -- in 1962 in a biological context. In the meantime Buckminster Fuller also used subdivided icosahedral structures for the construction of his geodesic domes. In 1971 Coxeter published a survey article that refers to these constructions. Subsequently, the literature often refers to the Goldberg-Coxeter construction. This construction is actually that of Caspar and Klug. Moreover, there are essential differences between this (Caspar/Klug/Coxeter) approach and the approaches of Fuller and of Goldberg. We will sketch the different approaches and generalize Goldberg's approach to a systematic one encompassing all local symmetry-preserving operations on polyhedra.

Human review

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.