Pith. sign in

REVIEW

A Radio Emission Analysis of Classical Nova V351 Pup (1991)

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1705.02926 v2 pith:MA2FBGUP submitted 2017-05-08 astro-ph.SR astro-ph.HE

A Radio Emission Analysis of Classical Nova V351 Pup (1991)

classification astro-ph.SR astro-ph.HE
keywords v351ejectaradiomassnovaassumptionclassicalcurve
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

Previously, Nova Puppis 1991 (V351 Pup) was measured to host one of the most massive ejections claimed in the literature. Multi-frequency radio detections from one epoch were published for this nova in the 1990's, and yet, the remaining data collected by the Very Large Array (VLA) have remained unpublished. In this paper, we analyze the remaining unpublished data sets for V351 Pup at frequencies of 4.9, 8.4, 14.9, and 22.5 GHz. We fit the resulting light curve to a model of expanding thermal ejecta, under the assumption that the radio emission is dominated by free-free radiation and accounting for high levels of clumping in the ejecta. Images of V351 Pup in both the radio (from the VLA) and H$\alpha$+[N II] (from HST) exhibit no aspherical structure, strengthening our assumption of spherical symmetry. From expansion parallax methods, we estimate the distance to V351 Pup to be $5.0 \pm 1.5$ kpc. Our light curve fit yields a value of $log_{10}(M_{ej})={-5.2} \pm {0.7}$ M$_{\odot}$ for the ejecta mass, implying that V351 Pup is on the low end of expectations for ejecta mass from classical novae. A comparison between our derived ejecta mass and theoretical models gives evidence for a very massive (1.25 M$_{\odot}$) white dwarf, which is consistent with spectroscopic evidence for an oxygen-neon white dwarf.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.