RECORD
A clearer approach for defining unit systems
General Physics · Submitted 8 May 2017
abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review
The authors' main claim This framework clarifies how different unit systems are interrelated, and identifies the key pieces of information that are needed to define both a unit system and the equations that are to be used with it.
The compiled record
The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.
Open the compiled record
The abstract, sentence by sentence
We present the SI and other unit systems, including cgs-em and cgs-es, in a framework whereby a system of fully independent and dimensionally orthogonal base units is modified by conventions designed to simplify the equations that are used within each system. We propose that the radian can be seen as an independent unit whose dimensional status is modified in the SI and other unit systems for this purpose. This framework clarifies how different unit systems are interrelated, and identifies the key pieces of information that are needed to define both a unit system and the equations that are to be used with it. Specifically, these are the size of the base units in the unsimplified system, together with sufficient equations to identify all the conventions adopted by the particular unit system. The appropriate extra information for the revised SI is presented. We do not propose that the treatment of angles as dimensionless within the SI is changed. It is also proposed that the Gaussian unit system is best seen as identical to cgs-es, but with the B and H symbols in equations used to represent relativistic versions of B and H, which should properly be treated as different quantities. These different versions of B and H can similarly be used within the SI, with many of the advantages of the Heaviside-Lorentz system.
background contribution method result interpretation main claim
| # | sentence | role | the authors' own work | states the main conclusion | strength |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| s0 | We present the SI and other unit systems, including cgs-em and cgs-es, in a framework whereby a system of fully independent and dimensionally orthogonal base units is modified by conventions designed to simplify the equations that are used within each system. | contribution 0.96 | 0.80 | 0.23 | asserted 1.00 |
| s1 | We propose that the radian can be seen as an independent unit whose dimensional status is modified in the SI and other unit systems for this purpose. | contribution 0.95 | 0.69 | 0.27 | hedged possibility 0.76 |
| s2 | This framework clarifies how different unit systems are interrelated, and identifies the key pieces of information that are needed to define both a unit system and the equations that are to be used with it. | contribution 0.64 | 0.84 | 0.46 | asserted 1.00 |
| s3 | Specifically, these are the size of the base units in the unsimplified system, together with sufficient equations to identify all the conventions adopted by the particular unit system. | contribution 0.54 | 0.61 | 0.25 | asserted 1.00 |
| s4 | The appropriate extra information for the revised SI is presented. | contribution 0.96 | 0.80 | 0.10 | asserted 0.97 |
| s5 | We do not propose that the treatment of angles as dimensionless within the SI is changed. | limitation 0.93 | 0.53 | 0.07 | asserted 0.96 |
| s6 | It is also proposed that the Gaussian unit system is best seen as identical to cgs-es, but with the B and H symbols in equations used to represent relativistic versions of B and H, which should properly be treated as different quantities. | contribution 0.62 | 0.46 | 0.10 | hedged possibility 0.74 |
| s7 | These different versions of B and H can similarly be used within the SI, with many of the advantages of the Heaviside-Lorentz system. | interpretation 0.68 | 0.35 | 0.08 | asserted 0.55 |
What was examined, and what was not
- arXiv listing abstract v1
- full text
- figures and tables
- references and citing sentences
- relations to other papers
- P abstract
- S sections
- T body sentences
- C citations
- R cross-paper relations
The paper
Original abstract
We present the SI and other unit systems, including cgs-em and cgs-es, in a framework whereby a system of fully independent and dimensionally orthogonal base units is modified by conventions designed to simplify the equations that are used within each system. We propose that the radian can be seen as an independent unit whose dimensional status is modified in the SI and other unit systems for this purpose. This framework clarifies how different unit systems are interrelated, and identifies the key pieces of information that are needed to define both a unit system and the equations that are to be used with it. Specifically, these are the size of the base units in the unsimplified system, together with sufficient equations to identify all the conventions adopted by the particular unit system. The appropriate extra information for the revised SI is presented. We do not propose that the treatment of angles as dimensionless within the SI is changed. It is also proposed that the Gaussian unit system is best seen as identical to cgs-es, but with the B and H symbols in equations used to represent relativistic versions of B and H, which should properly be treated as different quantities. These different versions of B and H can similarly be used within the SI, with many of the advantages of the Heaviside-Lorentz system.
Human review
Discussion
Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.