Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Why are Big Data Matrices Approximately Low Rank?

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1705.07474 v2 pith:OKAWOJMH submitted 2017-05-21 cs.LG stat.ML

classification cs.LGstat.ML
keywords rankmatrixmatricesdatalatentmodelapproximateerror
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
abstract

Matrices of (approximate) low rank are pervasive in data science, appearing in recommender systems, movie preferences, topic models, medical records, and genomics. While there is a vast literature on how to exploit low rank structure in these datasets, there is less attention on explaining why the low rank structure appears in the first place. Here, we explain the effectiveness of low rank models in data science by considering a simple generative model for these matrices: we suppose that each row or column is associated to a (possibly high dimensional) bounded latent variable, and entries of the matrix are generated by applying a piecewise analytic function to these latent variables. These matrices are in general full rank. However, we show that we can approximate every entry of an $m \times n$ matrix drawn from this model to within a fixed absolute error by a low rank matrix whose rank grows as $\mathcal O(\log(m + n))$. Hence any sufficiently large matrix from such a latent variable model can be approximated, up to a small entrywise error, by a low rank matrix.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. OpenAlex reports about 8 citations worldwide. Full citation record

  1. Impact of Bottleneck Layers and Skip Connections on the Generalization of Linear Denoising Autoencoders

    stat.ML 2025-05 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    Two-layer linear denoising autoencoders show a bias-variance trade-off in bottleneck width, and skip connections reduce variance near the interpolation peak.

Pith tools