Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Causal inference for social network data

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1705.08527 v6 pith:5MXY4C4K submitted 2017-05-23 stat.ME math.STstat.TH

classification stat.MEmath.STstat.TH
keywords networkcausalsocialdependenceeffectsdatatiesallow
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

We describe semiparametric estimation and inference for causal effects using observational data from a single social network. Our asymptotic results are the first to allow for dependence of each observation on a growing number of other units as sample size increases. In addition, while previous methods have implicitly permitted only one of two possible sources of dependence among social network observations, we allow for both dependence due to transmission of information across network ties and for dependence due to latent similarities among nodes sharing ties. We propose new causal effects that are specifically of interest in social network settings, such as interventions on network ties and network structure. We use our methods to reanalyze an influential and controversial study that estimated causal peer effects of obesity using social network data from the Framingham Heart Study; after accounting for network structure we find no evidence for causal peer effects.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Algorithm Adaptation Bias in Recommendation System Online Experiments

    cs.IR 2025-08 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    Recommendation-system A/B tests can systematically underestimate a new algorithm's true deployment effect because a small treatment group cannot trigger the full ecosystem's feedback loops, a bias the paper formalizes...

Pith tools