Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

The Future of Ad Blocking: An Analytical Framework and New Techniques

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1705.08568 v1 pith:7NL67GZF submitted 2017-05-24 cs.CR

classification cs.CR
keywords blockingtechniquesarmsmodelraceblockersdetectiongrowth
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

We present a systematic study of ad blocking - and the associated "arms race" - as a security problem. We model ad blocking as a state space with four states and six state transitions, which correspond to techniques that can be deployed by either publishers or ad blockers. We argue that this is a complete model of the system. We propose several new ad blocking techniques, including ones that borrow ideas from rootkits to prevent detection by anti-ad blocking scripts. Another technique uses the insight that ads must be recognizable by humans to comply with laws and industry self-regulation. We have built prototype implementations of three of these techniques, successfully blocking ads and evading detection. We systematically evaluate our proposed techniques, along with existing ones, in terms of security, practicality, and legality. We characterize the order of growth of the development effort required to create/maintain ad blockers as a function of the growth of the web. Based on our state-space model, our new techniques, and this systematization, we offer insights into the likely "end game" of the arms race. We challenge the widespread assumption that the arms race will escalate indefinitely, and instead identify a combination of evolving technical and legal factors that will determine the outcome.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Agentic AI: User Empowerment or Enclosure?

    cs.CY 2026-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A comparative study of four digital technologies finds that user control erodes when contestable choices are embedded in closed technical standards, and warns that agentic AI is repeating that pattern now.

Pith tools