Pith. Sign in

RECORD

Understanding solar cycle variability

Solar and Stellar Astrophysics · Submitted 30 May 2017

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim Drawing from dynamo theory together with empirical results of past solar activity and of similar phenomena on solar-like stars, we show that the variability of the solar cycle can be essentially understood in terms of a weakly nonlinear limit cycle affected by random noise.

how it is stated · asserted 1.00 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv ID1705.10746 (version 1)
Pith IDPLOQKXHV, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationManfred Sch\"ussler, Robert Cameron. "Understanding solar cycle variability." arXiv:1705.10746 (2017). https://pith.science/paper/PLOQKXHV
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13.0 via TypeSafe API, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 4,966 input tokens.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.06 · states limitation 0.09 · human participants 0.01 · controlled comparison 0.12 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.46 · compares with prior results 0.97 · mentions code or data availability 0.02.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v1. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

The level of solar magnetic activity, as exemplified by the number of sunspots and by energetic events in the corona, varies on a wide range of time scales. Most prominent is the 11-year solar cycle, which is significantly modulated on longer time scales. Drawing from dynamo theory together with empirical results of past solar activity and of similar phenomena on solar-like stars, we show that the variability of the solar cycle can be essentially understood in terms of a weakly nonlinear limit cycle affected by random noise. In contrast to ad-hoc `toy models' for the solar cycle, this leads to a generic normal-form model, whose parameters are all constrained by observations. The model reproduces the characteristics of the variable solar activity on time scales between decades and millennia, including the occurrence and statistics of extended periods of very low activity (grand minima). Comparison with results obtained with a Babcock-Leighton-type dynamo model confirms the validity of the normal-mode approach.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 The level of solar magnetic activity, as exemplified by the number of sunspots and by energetic events in the corona, varies on a wide range of time scales. background 1.00 0.10 0.02 asserted 1.00
s1 Most prominent is the 11-year solar cycle, which is significantly modulated on longer time scales. background 1.00 0.10 0.04 asserted 1.00
s2 Drawing from dynamo theory together with empirical results of past solar activity and of similar phenomena on solar-like stars, we show that the variability of the solar cycle can be essentially understood in terms of a weakly nonlinear limit cycle affected by random noise. contribution 0.47 0.92 0.87 asserted 1.00
s3 In contrast to ad-hoc `toy models' for the solar cycle, this leads to a generic normal-form model, whose parameters are all constrained by observations. contribution 0.77 0.84 0.10 asserted 1.00
s4 The model reproduces the characteristics of the variable solar activity on time scales between decades and millennia, including the occurrence and statistics of extended periods of very low activity (grand minima). result 1.00 0.90 0.26 asserted 1.00
s5 Comparison with results obtained with a Babcock-Leighton-type dynamo model confirms the validity of the normal-mode approach. result 0.77 0.78 0.10 asserted 0.99

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: theoretical result 1.00 · evidence from simulation or computation 0.29.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v1
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

The level of solar magnetic activity, as exemplified by the number of sunspots and by energetic events in the corona, varies on a wide range of time scales. Most prominent is the 11-year solar cycle, which is significantly modulated on longer time scales. Drawing from dynamo theory together with empirical results of past solar activity and of similar phenomena on solar-like stars, we show that the variability of the solar cycle can be essentially understood in terms of a weakly nonlinear limit cycle affected by random noise. In contrast to ad-hoc `toy models' for the solar cycle, this leads to a generic normal-form model, whose parameters are all constrained by observations. The model reproduces the characteristics of the variable solar activity on time scales between decades and millennia, including the occurrence and statistics of extended periods of very low activity (grand minima). Comparison with results obtained with a Babcock-Leighton-type dynamo model confirms the validity of the normal-mode approach.

Human review
References
How the literature uses it

5 arXiv papers cite this in 5 sentences

Each citing sentence is taken from the citing paper's LaTeX source and typed by Pith's classifier. A label appears at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more; the quoted words are the citing authors'. How each label was checked · JSON

Papers citing it · 2 sentences without a confident label

Contests it 1 paper
Cites it as support 1 paper
  • [ref] modelled the overall power spectrum of solar activity using a generic normal form model for a noisy and weakly nonlinear limit cycle, and [ref] showed that the long-term modulations beyond the 11-year cycle are consistent with the realization noise, thus casting doubt whether secular and supersecular modulations are connected to the intrinsic periodicities of the solar dynamo.

    Long-term modulation of solar cycles · dynamo models for the long-term variation · 0.98

Cites it as background 1 paper
  • While such a “hard” synchronization of the basic Hale cycle with planetary tidal forces was advocated by only a few researchers, much more interest was dedicated to various kinds of “soft” planetary modulation of that cycle (whose length is usually believed to be determined by intrinsic solar parameters [ref] ).

    On the synchronizability of Tayler-Spruit and Babcock-Leighton type dynamos · Introduction · 0.96

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.