REVIEW 2 cited by
Improved Consistent Weighted Sampling Revisited
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
abstract
Min-Hash is a popular technique for efficiently estimating the Jaccard similarity of binary sets. Consistent Weighted Sampling (CWS) generalizes the Min-Hash scheme to sketch weighted sets and has drawn increasing interest from the community. Due to its constant-time complexity independent of the values of the weights, Improved CWS (ICWS) is considered as the state-of-the-art CWS algorithm. In this paper, we revisit ICWS and analyze its underlying mechanism to show that there actually exists dependence between the two components of the hash-code produced by ICWS, which violates the condition of independence. To remedy the problem, we propose an Improved ICWS (I$^2$CWS) algorithm which not only shares the same theoretical computational complexity as ICWS but also abides by the required conditions of the CWS scheme. The experimental results on a number of synthetic data sets and real-world text data sets demonstrate that our I$^2$CWS algorithm can estimate the Jaccard similarity more accurately, and also compete with or outperform the compared methods, including ICWS, in classification and top-$K$ retrieval, after relieving the underlying dependence.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Visualization of Very Large High-Dimensional Data Sets as Minimum Spanning Trees
TMAP visualizes up to millions of high-dimensional points as an interactive 2D tree by computing an approximate nearest-neighbor graph and drawing its minimum spanning tree.
-
Sampling-Based Estimation of Jaccard Containment and Similarity
A binomial approximation to the sample overlap likelihood yields a simple estimator for Jaccard containment, but several of the paper's error bounds and sample size formulas are not rigorously supported.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.