REVIEW 1 cited by
Manifold Regularized Slow Feature Analysis for Dynamic Texture Recognition
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
Dynamic textures exist in various forms, e.g., fire, smoke, and traffic jams, but recognizing dynamic texture is challenging due to the complex temporal variations. In this paper, we present a novel approach stemmed from slow feature analysis (SFA) for dynamic texture recognition. SFA extracts slowly varying features from fast varying signals. Fortunately, SFA is capable to leach invariant representations from dynamic textures. However, complex temporal variations require high-level semantic representations to fully achieve temporal slowness, and thus it is impractical to learn a high-level representation from dynamic textures directly by SFA. In order to learn a robust low-level feature to resolve the complexity of dynamic textures, we propose manifold regularized SFA (MR-SFA) by exploring the neighbor relationship of the initial state of each temporal transition and retaining the locality of their variations. Therefore, the learned features are not only slowly varying, but also partly predictable. MR-SFA for dynamic texture recognition is proposed in the following steps: 1) learning feature extraction functions as convolution filters by MR-SFA, 2) extracting local features by convolution and pooling, and 3) employing Fisher vectors to form a video-level representation for classification. Experimental results on dynamic texture and dynamic scene recognition datasets validate the effectiveness of the proposed approach.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
State Stabilization for Gate-Model Quantum Computers
The paper adapts slow feature analysis to gate parameters, claiming it stabilizes an optimal quantum state, but the claim lacks a proof and the evaluation is disconnected from the algorithm.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.