RECORD
Survival probabilities of high-dimensional stochastic SIS and SIR models with random edge weights
Probability · Submitted 26 Jun 2017
abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review
The authors' main claim Our main result gives mean field limits for survival probabilities of the two models as the dimension grows to infinity, which extends the main conclusion given in \cite{Xue2017} for classic stochastic SIS model.
The compiled record
The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.
Open the compiled record
The abstract, sentence by sentence
In this paper, we are concerned with the stochastic SIS (susceptible-infected-susceptible) and SIR (susceptible-infected-recovered) models on high-dimensional lattices with random edge weights, where a susceptible vertex is infected by an infectious neighbor at rate proportional to the weight on the edge connecting them. All the edge weights are assumed to be i.i.d.. Our main result gives mean field limits for survival probabilities of the two models as the dimension grows to infinity, which extends the main conclusion given in \cite{Xue2017} for classic stochastic SIS model.
background contribution method result interpretation main claim
| # | sentence | role | the authors' own work | states the main conclusion | strength |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| s0 | In this paper, we are concerned with the stochastic SIS (susceptible-infected-susceptible) and SIR (susceptible-infected-recovered) models on high-dimensional lattices with random edge weights, where a susceptible vertex is infected by an infectious neighbor at rate proportional to the weight on the edge connecting them. | background 0.55 | 0.21 | 0.04 | asserted 0.90 |
| s1 | All the edge weights are assumed to be i.i.d.. | method 0.95 | 0.25 | 0.02 | asserted 1.00 |
| s2 | Our main result gives mean field limits for survival probabilities of the two models as the dimension grows to infinity, which extends the main conclusion given in \cite{Xue2017} for classic stochastic SIS model. | result 0.91 | 0.93 | 0.97 | asserted 1.00 |
What was examined, and what was not
- arXiv listing abstract v1
- full text
- figures and tables
- references and citing sentences
- relations to other papers
- P abstract
- S sections
- T body sentences
- C citations
- R cross-paper relations
The paper
Original abstract
In this paper, we are concerned with the stochastic SIS (susceptible-infected-susceptible) and SIR (susceptible-infected-recovered) models on high-dimensional lattices with random edge weights, where a susceptible vertex is infected by an infectious neighbor at rate proportional to the weight on the edge connecting them. All the edge weights are assumed to be i.i.d.. Our main result gives mean field limits for survival probabilities of the two models as the dimension grows to infinity, which extends the main conclusion given in \cite{Xue2017} for classic stochastic SIS model.
Human review
How the literature uses it
1 arXiv paper cite this in 3 sentences
Papers citing it
Uses its method or tool 1 paper
-
First we give a sketch of the proof, which is inspired by the approach introduced in [ref] .
The survival probability of the high-dimensional contact process with random vertex weights on the oriented lattice · Proof of Equation [ref] · 1.00
Compares with it 1 paper
-
It is claimed in [ref] that [equation] for the process with edge weights which are independent copies of $ρ$ and infection rate $λ>1/Eρ$.
The survival probability of the high-dimensional contact process with random vertex weights on the oriented lattice · Main results · 0.88
What it cites · 2 sentences without a confident label
Uses the method or tool of 1 paper
-
The proof utilizes the following Proposition given in [ref] .
Asymptotic for critical value of the large-dimensional SIR epidemic on clusters · Proof of Lemma [ref] · 0.88
Discussion
Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.