RECORD
Parameter uncertainty in structural equation models: Confidence sets and fungible estimates
Methodology · Submitted 9 Jul 2017
abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review
The authors' main claim This paper highlights the value and importance of two distinct kinds of parameter uncertainty which are quantified by confidence sets (CSs) and fungible parameter estimates (FPEs); both provide essential information regarding the defensibility of scientific findings.
The compiled record
The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.
Open the compiled record
The abstract, sentence by sentence
Current concerns regarding the dependability of psychological findings call for methodological developments to provide additional evidence in support of scientific conclusions. This paper highlights the value and importance of two distinct kinds of parameter uncertainty which are quantified by confidence sets (CSs) and fungible parameter estimates (FPEs); both provide essential information regarding the defensibility of scientific findings. Using the structural equation model, we introduce a general perturbation framework based on the likelihood function that unifies CSs and FPEs and sheds new light on the conceptual distinctions between them. A targeted illustration is then presented to demonstrate the factors which differentially influence CSs and FPEs, further highlighting their theoretical differences. With three empirical examples on initiating a conversation with a stranger, posttraumatic growth of caregivers in the context of pediatric palliative care, and the direct and indirect effects of spirituality on thriving among youth, we illustrate how CSs and FPEs provide unique information which lead to better informed scientific conclusions. Finally, we discuss the importance of considering information afforded by CSs and FPEs in strengthening the basis of interpreting statistical results in substantive research, conclude with future research directions, and provide example OpenMx code for the computation of CSs and FPEs.
background contribution method result interpretation main claim
| # | sentence | role | the authors' own work | states the main conclusion | strength |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| s0 | Current concerns regarding the dependability of psychological findings call for methodological developments to provide additional evidence in support of scientific conclusions. | background 1.00 | 0.04 | 0.03 | asserted 0.95 |
| s1 | This paper highlights the value and importance of two distinct kinds of parameter uncertainty which are quantified by confidence sets (CSs) and fungible parameter estimates (FPEs); both provide essential information regarding the defensibility of scientific findings. | contribution 0.91 | 0.24 | 0.45 | asserted 1.00 |
| s2 | Using the structural equation model, we introduce a general perturbation framework based on the likelihood function that unifies CSs and FPEs and sheds new light on the conceptual distinctions between them. | contribution 0.73 | 0.95 | 0.14 | asserted 1.00 |
| s3 | A targeted illustration is then presented to demonstrate the factors which differentially influence CSs and FPEs, further highlighting their theoretical differences. | contribution 0.63 | 0.89 | 0.04 | asserted 0.99 |
| s4 | With three empirical examples on initiating a conversation with a stranger, posttraumatic growth of caregivers in the context of pediatric palliative care, and the direct and indirect effects of spirituality on thriving among youth, we illustrate how CSs and FPEs provide unique information which lead to better informed scientific conclusions. | contribution 0.64 | 0.92 | 0.24 | asserted 1.00 |
| s5 | Finally, we discuss the importance of considering information afforded by CSs and FPEs in strengthening the basis of interpreting statistical results in substantive research, conclude with future research directions, and provide example OpenMx code for the computation of CSs and FPEs. | future work 0.85 | 0.83 | 0.47 | asserted 0.91 |
What was examined, and what was not
- arXiv listing abstract v1
- full text
- figures and tables
- references and citing sentences
- relations to other papers
- P abstract
- S sections
- T body sentences
- C citations
- R cross-paper relations
The paper
Original abstract
Current concerns regarding the dependability of psychological findings call for methodological developments to provide additional evidence in support of scientific conclusions. This paper highlights the value and importance of two distinct kinds of parameter uncertainty which are quantified by confidence sets (CSs) and fungible parameter estimates (FPEs); both provide essential information regarding the defensibility of scientific findings. Using the structural equation model, we introduce a general perturbation framework based on the likelihood function that unifies CSs and FPEs and sheds new light on the conceptual distinctions between them. A targeted illustration is then presented to demonstrate the factors which differentially influence CSs and FPEs, further highlighting their theoretical differences. With three empirical examples on initiating a conversation with a stranger, posttraumatic growth of caregivers in the context of pediatric palliative care, and the direct and indirect effects of spirituality on thriving among youth, we illustrate how CSs and FPEs provide unique information which lead to better informed scientific conclusions. Finally, we discuss the importance of considering information afforded by CSs and FPEs in strengthening the basis of interpreting statistical results in substantive research, conclude with future research directions, and provide example OpenMx code for the computation of CSs and FPEs.
Human review
Discussion
Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.