REVIEW 2 cited by
Recognizing Abnormal Heart Sounds Using Deep Learning
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
The work presented here applies deep learning to the task of automated cardiac auscultation, i.e. recognizing abnormalities in heart sounds. We describe an automated heart sound classification algorithm that combines the use of time-frequency heat map representations with a deep convolutional neural network (CNN). Given the cost-sensitive nature of misclassification, our CNN architecture is trained using a modified loss function that directly optimizes the trade-off between sensitivity and specificity. We evaluated our algorithm at the 2016 PhysioNet Computing in Cardiology challenge where the objective was to accurately classify normal and abnormal heart sounds from single, short, potentially noisy recordings. Our entry to the challenge achieved a final specificity of 0.95, sensitivity of 0.73 and overall score of 0.84. We achieved the greatest specificity score out of all challenge entries and, using just a single CNN, our algorithm differed in overall score by only 0.02 compared to the top place finisher, which used an ensemble approach.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Quantitative Analysis of Proxy Tasks for Anomalous Sound Detection
Better proxy-task performance does not generally improve anomalous sound detection; only source separation showed a strong, consistent positive correlation.
-
Comparing Spectrogram Front-Ends for Abnormal Heart-Sound Detection with a Convolutional Neural Network
PCEN (0.915) and multi-resolution (0.916) spectrogram front-ends slightly outperform plain log-mel (0.910) on PhysioNet 2016 modified accuracy, with ~0.95 sensitivity across all three.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.