Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Learning Dynamical Systems and Bifurcation via Group Sparsity

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1709.01558 v1 pith:72NE6SHY submitted 2017-09-05 math.NA cs.NA

Learning Dynamical Systems and Bifurcation via Group Sparsity

classification math.NA cs.NA
keywords bifurcationdatanumericaldynamicallearningmethodparameterrange
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

Learning governing equations from a family of data sets which share the same physical laws but differ in bifurcation parameters is challenging. This is due, in part, to the wide range of phenomena that could be represented in the data sets as well as the range of parameter values. On the other hand, it is common to assume only a small number of candidate functions contribute to the observed dynamics. Based on these observations, we propose a group-sparse penalized method for model selection and parameter estimation for such data. We also provide convergence guarantees for our proposed numerical scheme. Various numerical experiments including the 1D logistic equation, the 3D Lorenz sampled from different bifurcation regions, and a switching system provide numerical validation for our method and suggest potential applications to applied dynamical systems.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Data-driven Discovery of Digital Twins in Biomedical Research

    q-bio.QM 2025-08 conditional novelty 2.0

    Sparse regression, especially Bayesian approaches, generally outperform symbolic regression for ODE-based digital twin discovery in biology, though the evidence is qualitative and non-systematic.