Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Testing the Kerr black hole hypothesis with RELXILL_NK

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1709.02900 v2 pith:DQX6VJYX submitted 2017-09-09 gr-qc

classification gr-qc
keywords blackkerrholedeviationsgravityhypothesisreflectionrelxill
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Astrophysical black hole candidates are thought to be the Kerr black holes of general relativity. However, macroscopic deviations from the Kerr background are predicted by a number of scenarios beyond Einstein's gravity. X-ray reflection spectroscopy can be a powerful tool to probe the strong gravity region of these objects and test the Kerr black hole hypothesis. Here I briefly review the state of the art of this line of research and I present some constraints on possible deviations from the Kerr metric obtained with the new X-ray reflection model relxill_nk and XMM-Newton, NuSTAR, and Swift data of the supermassive black hole in 1H0707-495.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Pith tools