REVIEW 2 cited by
Optimal verification of entangled states with local measurements
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
Consider the task of verifying that a given quantum device, designed to produce a particular entangled state, does indeed produce that state. One natural approach would be to characterise the output state by quantum state tomography; or alternatively to perform some kind of Bell test, tailored to the state of interest. We show here that neither approach is optimal amongst local verification strategies for two qubit states. We find the optimal strategy in this case and show that quadratically fewer total measurements are needed to verify to within a given fidelity than in published results for quantum state tomography, Bell test, or fidelity estimation protocols. We also give efficient verification protocols for any stabilizer state. Additionally, we show that requiring that the strategy be constructed from local, non-adaptive and non-collective measurements only incurs a constant-factor penalty over a strategy without these restrictions.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Verifying a stabilizer state with few observables but many shots
A random-basis, minimum-of-means stabilizer certification protocol accepts good states and rejects bad states with error probabilities exponentially small in qubit number under a wide fidelity gap.
-
Entanglement Certification $-$ From Theory to Experiment
Reviews paradigmatic entanglement quantifiers and state-of-the-art detection/certification methods, with emphasis on assumptions about states and measurements.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.