Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

NIMA: Neural Image Assessment

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1709.05424 v2 pith:WK2GOKBW submitted 2017-09-15 cs.CV

classification cs.CV
keywords assessmentimageapproachhumanimagesmethodsnetworkneural
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Automatically learned quality assessment for images has recently become a hot topic due to its usefulness in a wide variety of applications such as evaluating image capture pipelines, storage techniques and sharing media. Despite the subjective nature of this problem, most existing methods only predict the mean opinion score provided by datasets such as AVA [1] and TID2013 [2]. Our approach differs from others in that we predict the distribution of human opinion scores using a convolutional neural network. Our architecture also has the advantage of being significantly simpler than other methods with comparable performance. Our proposed approach relies on the success (and retraining) of proven, state-of-the-art deep object recognition networks. Our resulting network can be used to not only score images reliably and with high correlation to human perception, but also to assist with adaptation and optimization of photo editing/enhancement algorithms in a photographic pipeline. All this is done without need for a "golden" reference image, consequently allowing for single-image, semantic- and perceptually-aware, no-reference quality assessment.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Explaining Automatic Image Assessment

    cs.CV 2025-02 reject novelty 4.0 of 10

    Training separate NIMA-style models on depth, saliency, and blur versions of AVA shows saliency carries the most signal among non-RGB modalities, while the standard 5.0 threshold inflates baselines to above 70 percent.

Pith tools