Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Measurements of the absolute branching fractions of B⁺ to X_{cbar{c}} K⁺ and B⁺ to bar{D}^((ast) 0) π⁺ at Belle

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1709.06108 v2 pith:CG2BUWXU submitted 2017-09-18 hep-ex

Measurements of the absolute branching fractions of B⁺ to X_{cbar{c}} K⁺ and B⁺ to bar{D}^((ast) 0) π⁺ at Belle

Y. Kato , T. Iijima , I. Adachi , H. Aihara , S. Al Said , D. M. Asner , V. Aulchenko , T. Aushev
show 178 more authors
R. Ayad V. Babu I. Badhrees A. M. Bakich V. Bansal E. Barberio P. Behera V. Bhardwaj B. Bhuyan J. Biswal A. Bozek M. Bra\v{c}ko T. E. Browder D. \v{C}ervenkov P. Chang R. Cheaib V. Chekelian A. Chen B. G. Cheon K. Chilikin K. Cho S.-K. Choi Y. Choi D. Cinabro T. Czank N. Dash S. Di Carlo Z. Dole\v{z}al Z. Dr\'asal D. Dutta S. Eidelman D. Epifanov J. E. Fast T. Ferber B. G. Fulsom V. Gaur N. Gabyshev A. Garmash M. Gelb P. Goldenzweig D. Greenwald E. Guido J. Haba K. Hayasaka H. Hayashii M. T. Hedges S. Hirose W.-S. Hou K. Inami G. Inguglia A. Ishikawa R. Itoh Y. Iwasaki W. W. Jacobs I. Jaegle H. B. Jeon Y. Jin K. K. Joo T. Julius A. B. Kaliyar K. H. Kang G. Karyan T. Kawasaki C. Kiesling D. Y. Kim J. B. Kim S. H. Kim Y. J. Kim K. Kinoshita P. Kody\v{s} S. Korpar D. Kotchetkov P. Kri\v{z}an R. Kroeger P. Krokovny T. Kuhr R. Kulasiri A. Kuzmin Y.-J. Kwon J. S. Lange I. S. Lee C. H. Li L. Li L. Li Gioi J. Libby D. Liventsev M. Lubej T. Luo M. Masuda T. Matsuda M. Merola K. Miyabayashi H. Miyata R. Mizuk G. B. Mohanty H. K. Moon T. Mori R. Mussa E. Nakano M. Nakao T. Nanut K. J. Nath Z. Natkaniec M. Nayak M. Niiyama N. K. Nisar S. Nishida S. Ogawa S. Okuno H. Ono P. Pakhlov G. Pakhlova B. Pal C.-S. Park C. W. Park H. Park S. Paul R. Pestotnik L. E. Piilonen M. Ritter A. Rostomyan Y. Sakai M. Salehi S. Sandilya Y. Sato V. Savinov O. Schneider G. Schnell C. Schwanda A. J. Schwartz Y. Seino K. Senyo M. E. Sevior V. Shebalin C. P. Shen T.-A. Shibata J.-G. Shiu F. Simon A. Sokolov E. Solovieva M. Stari\v{c} J. F. Strube M. Sumihama K. Sumisawa T. Sumiyoshi M. Takizawa U. Tamponi K. Tanida F. Tenchini K. Trabelsi M. Uchida S. Uehara T. Uglov Y. Unno S. Uno P. Urquijo Y. Usov C. Van Hulse G. Varner K. E. Varvell V. Vorobyev C. H. Wang M.-Z. Wang P. Wang M. Watanabe S. Watanuki E. Widmann E. Won Y. Yamashita H. Ye J. Yelton C. Z. Yuan Y. Yusa Z. P. Zhang V. Zhilich V. Zhukova V. Zhulanov A. Zupanc (The Belle collaboration)
This is my paper
classification hep-ex
keywords timesbranchingfractionsabsolutebelledatefirstmeasurement
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

We present the measurement of the absolute branching fractions of $B^{+} \to X_{c\bar{c}} K^{+}$ and $B^{+} \to \bar{D}^{(\ast) 0} \pi^{+} $ decays, using a data sample of $772\times10^{6}$ $B\bar{B}$ pairs collected at the $\Upsilon(4S)$ resonance with the Belle detector at the KEKB asymmetric-energy $e^{+}e^{-}$ collider. Here, $X_{c\bar{c}}$ denotes $\eta_{c}$, $J/\psi$, $\chi_{c0}$, $\chi_{c1}$, $\eta_{c}(2S)$, $\psi(2S)$, $\psi(3770)$, $X(3872)$, and $X(3915)$. We do not observe significant signals for $X(3872)$ nor $X(3915)$, and set the 90$\%$ confidence level upper limits: ${\cal B}(B^{+} \to X(3872) K^{+} )<2.7 \times 10^{-4}$ and ${\cal B}(B^{+} \to X(3915) K^{+} )<2.9 \times 10^{-4}$. These represent the most stringent upper limit for ${\cal B}(B^{+} \to X(3872) K^{+} )$ to date and the first measurement for ${\cal B}(B^{+} \to X(3915) K^{+} )$. The measured branching fractions for $\eta_{c}$ and $\eta_{c}(2S)$ are the most precise to date: ${\cal B}(B^{+} \to \eta_{c} K^{+} )=(12.3\pm0.8\pm0.7) \times 10^{-4}$ and ${\cal B}(B^{+} \to \eta_{c}(2S)K^{+}) =(4.9\pm1.1\pm0.3) \times 10^{-4}$ , where the first and second uncertainties are statistical and systematic, respectively.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.