REVIEW 1 cited by
On Non-Linear Quantum Mechanics and the Measurement Problem II. The Random Part of the Wavefunction
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
In the first paper of this series, I introduced a non-linear, Hamiltonian, generalization of Schroedinger's theory that blocks formation of macroscopic dispersion ("cats"). But that theory was entirely deterministic, and so the origin of random outcomes in experiments such as Stern-Gerlach or EPRB was left open. Here I propose that Schroedinger's wavefunction has a random component and demonstrate that such an improvised stochastic theory can violate Bell's inequality. Repeated measurements and the back-reaction on the microsystem are discussed in a toy example. Experiments that might falsify the theory are described.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
That Dot on the Screen: also, what about Born? and other objections to wavefunction physics
A toy nonlinear-wavefunction simulation produces a single detector dot without invoking particles or probabilities, but only after hand-tuning the model and with no verified chaos mechanism.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.