Pith. Sign in

RECORD

Localization of DES Supervisory Control with Event Reduction

PaperPDF from arXiv

data files

Paper breakdownThe authors' claims, conditions and measurements, as JSON Signed receiptProof this review has not been altered
X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit Hacker News
Vahid Saeidi, Ali A. Afzalian, Davood Gharavian

Systems and Control · Submitted 16 Oct 2017

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim In this paper, we propose a method to localize a supervisor with event reduction in each local controller comparing to the reduced supervisor.

how it is stated · asserted 1.00 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv ID1710.06776 (version 2)
Pith IDSJY4DEO6, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationAli A. Afzalian, Davood Gharavian, Vahid Saeidi. "Localization of DES Supervisory Control with Event Reduction." arXiv:1710.06776 (2017). https://pith.science/paper/SJY4DEO6
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13.0 via TypeSafe API, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 4,853 input tokens.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.09 · states limitation 0.10 · human participants 0.02 · controlled comparison 0.26 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.03 · compares with prior results 0.95 · mentions code or data availability 0.02.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v2. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

Supervisor localization procedure can be employed to construct local controllers corresponding to component agents in discrete-event systems. The proposed method in [11] is based on state reduction of a monolithic supervisor with respect to each set of controllable events corresponding to each component agent. A supervisor is localizable if state cardinality can be reduced from the reduced supervisor to each local controller. Although event reduction is an important property, the original supervisor localization procedure did not guarantee event reduction in each local controller comparing to the reduced supervisor. In this paper, we propose a method to localize a supervisor with event reduction in each local controller comparing to the reduced supervisor. State reduction facilitates the implementation of local controllers on industrial systems, whereas event reduction reduces communication traffic between each pair of local controllers.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 Supervisor localization procedure can be employed to construct local controllers corresponding to component agents in discrete-event systems. background 1.00 0.06 0.04 hedged possibility 0.60
s1 The proposed method in [11] is based on state reduction of a monolithic supervisor with respect to each set of controllable events corresponding to each component agent. background 0.98 0.05 0.04 asserted 1.00
s2 A supervisor is localizable if state cardinality can be reduced from the reduced supervisor to each local controller. background 0.96 0.10 0.05 asserted 0.99
s3 Although event reduction is an important property, the original supervisor localization procedure did not guarantee event reduction in each local controller comparing to the reduced supervisor. gap 0.97 0.08 0.05 asserted 1.00
s4 In this paper, we propose a method to localize a supervisor with event reduction in each local controller comparing to the reduced supervisor. contribution 1.00 0.91 0.74 asserted 1.00
s5 State reduction facilitates the implementation of local controllers on industrial systems, whereas event reduction reduces communication traffic between each pair of local controllers. interpretation 0.67 0.10 0.07 asserted 1.00

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: method or tool 1.00 · evidence from proof or derivation 0.60.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v2
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

Supervisor localization procedure can be employed to construct local controllers corresponding to component agents in discrete-event systems. The proposed method in [11] is based on state reduction of a monolithic supervisor with respect to each set of controllable events corresponding to each component agent. A supervisor is localizable if state cardinality can be reduced from the reduced supervisor to each local controller. Although event reduction is an important property, the original supervisor localization procedure did not guarantee event reduction in each local controller comparing to the reduced supervisor. In this paper, we propose a method to localize a supervisor with event reduction in each local controller comparing to the reduced supervisor. State reduction facilitates the implementation of local controllers on industrial systems, whereas event reduction reduces communication traffic between each pair of local controllers.

Human review

How Pith checks papers → · Full audit of this paper →

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.