RECORD
On the K\H{o}nig-Egerv\'ary Theorem for $k$-Paths
Combinatorics · Submitted 21 Oct 2017
abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review
The authors' main claim For $k\in \{ 3,4\}$, we give complete structural descriptions of the graphs in ${\cal G}_k$.
The compiled record
The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.
Open the compiled record
The abstract, sentence by sentence
The famous K\H{o}nig-Egerv\'ary theorem is equivalent to the statement that the matching number equals the vertex cover number for every induced subgraph of some graph if and only if that graph is bipartite. Inspired by this result, we consider the set ${\cal G}_k$ of all graphs such that, for every induced subgraph, the maximum number of disjoint paths of order $k$ equals the minimum order of a set of vertices intersecting all paths of order $k$. For $k\in \{ 3,4\}$, we give complete structural descriptions of the graphs in ${\cal G}_k$. Furthermore, for odd $k$, we give a complete structural description of the graphs in ${\cal G}_k$ that contain no cycle of order less than $k$. For these graph classes, our results yield efficient recognition algorithms as well as efficient algorithms that determine maximum sets of disjoint paths of order $k$ and minimum sets of vertices intersecting all paths of order $k$.
background contribution method result interpretation main claim
| # | sentence | role | the authors' own work | states the main conclusion | strength |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| s0 | The famous K\H{o}nig-Egerv\'ary theorem is equivalent to the statement that the matching number equals the vertex cover number for every induced subgraph of some graph if and only if that graph is bipartite. | background 1.00 | 0.05 | 0.05 | asserted 1.00 |
| s1 | Inspired by this result, we consider the set ${\cal G}_k$ of all graphs such that, for every induced subgraph, the maximum number of disjoint paths of order $k$ equals the minimum order of a set of vertices intersecting all paths of order $k$. | contribution 0.86 | 0.38 | 0.10 | asserted 0.76 |
| s2 | For $k\in \{ 3,4\}$, we give complete structural descriptions of the graphs in ${\cal G}_k$. | result 0.51 | 0.96 | 0.35 | asserted 1.00 |
| s3 | Furthermore, for odd $k$, we give a complete structural description of the graphs in ${\cal G}_k$ that contain no cycle of order less than $k$. | result 0.62 | 0.95 | 0.16 | asserted 1.00 |
| s4 | For these graph classes, our results yield efficient recognition algorithms as well as efficient algorithms that determine maximum sets of disjoint paths of order $k$ and minimum sets of vertices intersecting all paths of order $k$. | interpretation 0.44 | 0.94 | 0.22 | asserted 1.00 |
What was examined, and what was not
- arXiv listing abstract v1
- full text
- figures and tables
- references and citing sentences
- relations to other papers
- P abstract
- S sections
- T body sentences
- C citations
- R cross-paper relations
The paper
Original abstract
The famous K\H{o}nig-Egerv\'ary theorem is equivalent to the statement that the matching number equals the vertex cover number for every induced subgraph of some graph if and only if that graph is bipartite. Inspired by this result, we consider the set ${\cal G}_k$ of all graphs such that, for every induced subgraph, the maximum number of disjoint paths of order $k$ equals the minimum order of a set of vertices intersecting all paths of order $k$. For $k\in \{ 3,4\}$, we give complete structural descriptions of the graphs in ${\cal G}_k$. Furthermore, for odd $k$, we give a complete structural description of the graphs in ${\cal G}_k$ that contain no cycle of order less than $k$. For these graph classes, our results yield efficient recognition algorithms as well as efficient algorithms that determine maximum sets of disjoint paths of order $k$ and minimum sets of vertices intersecting all paths of order $k$.
Human review
Discussion
Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.