Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

The Insecurity of Home Digital Voice Assistants -- Amazon Alexa as a Case Study

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1712.03327 v3 pith:57IQQXUF submitted 2017-12-09 cs.CR

classification cs.CR
keywords alexavoiceamazoncontrolhomeaccesscommandsdevice
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Home Digital Voice Assistants (HDVAs) are getting popular in recent years. Users can control smart devices and get living assistance through those HDVAs (e.g., Amazon Alexa, Google Home) using voice. In this work, we study the insecurity of HDVA service by using Amazon Alexa as a case study. We disclose three security vulnerabilities which root in the insecure access control of Alexa services. We then exploit them to devise two proof-of-concept attacks, home burglary and fake order, where the adversary can remotely command the victim's Alexa device to open a door or place an order from Amazon.com. The insecure access control is that the Alexa device not only relies on a single-factor authentication but also takes voice commands even if no people are around. We thus argue that HDVAs should have another authentication factor, a physical presence based access control; that is, they can accept voice commands only when any person is detected nearby. To this end, we devise a Virtual Security Button (VSButton), which leverages the WiFi technology to detect indoor human motions. Once any indoor human motion is detected, the Alexa device is enabled to accept voice commands. Our evaluation results show that it can effectively differentiate indoor motions from the cases of no motion and outdoor motions in both the laboratory and real world settings.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. ML Mule: Mobile-Driven Context-Aware Collaborative Learning

    cs.LG 2025-01 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Using mobile devices as physical couriers of model snapshots between fixed devices in different spaces outperforms federated, decentralized, and local-only learning in simulated and prototype settings.

Pith tools