Pith. Sign in

RECORD

$C^1$ stability of endomorphisms on two dimensional manifolds

Dynamical Systems · Submitted 21 Dec 2017

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim It is proved that the conditions are sufficient for $C^1$ stability in compact oriented manifolds of dimension two.

how it is stated · asserted 1.00 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv ID1712.08114 (version 1)
Pith IDXFWESNBP, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationA. Portela, J. Iglesias. "$C^1$ stability of endomorphisms on two dimensional manifolds." arXiv:1712.08114 (2017). https://pith.science/paper/XFWESNBP
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13.0 via TypeSafe API, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 3,595 input tokens.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.90 · states limitation 0.54 · human participants 0.01 · controlled comparison 0.02 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.11 · compares with prior results 0.92 · mentions code or data availability 0.01.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v1. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

A set of necessary conditions for $C^1$ stability of noninvertible maps is presented. It is proved that the conditions are sufficient for $C^1$ stability in compact oriented manifolds of dimension two. An example given by F.Przytycki in 1977 is shown to satisfy these conditions. It is the first example known of a $C^1$ stable map (noninvertible and nonexpanding) in a manifold of dimension two, while a wide class of examples are already known in every other dimension. \end{abstract}

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 A set of necessary conditions for $C^1$ stability of noninvertible maps is presented. contribution 0.61 0.86 0.13 asserted 0.99
s1 It is proved that the conditions are sufficient for $C^1$ stability in compact oriented manifolds of dimension two. result 0.95 0.90 0.71 asserted 1.00
s2 An example given by F.Przytycki in 1977 is shown to satisfy these conditions. result 0.77 0.79 0.06 asserted 1.00
s3 It is the first example known of a $C^1$ stable map (noninvertible and nonexpanding) in a manifold of dimension two, while a wide class of examples are already known in every other dimension. \end{abstract} interpretation 0.43 0.54 0.29 asserted 1.00

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: theoretical result 1.00 · evidence from proof or derivation 1.00.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v1
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

A set of necessary conditions for $C^1$ stability of noninvertible maps is presented. It is proved that the conditions are sufficient for $C^1$ stability in compact oriented manifolds of dimension two. An example given by F.Przytycki in 1977 is shown to satisfy these conditions. It is the first example known of a $C^1$ stable map (noninvertible and nonexpanding) in a manifold of dimension two, while a wide class of examples are already known in every other dimension. \end{abstract}

Human review

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.