Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Linking Administrative Data: An Evolutionary Schema

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1712.08522 v1 pith:U3NDDDD6 submitted 2017-12-20 stat.ME

Linking Administrative Data: An Evolutionary Schema

classification stat.ME
keywords datastatisticaladministrativerepresentativenesswereauthorsbiasedcontext
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Statistics New Zealand (Stats NZ) has committed unreservedly to an administrative data first policy. Thus, all new methods used at Stats NZ are to be viewed within this context and discussing strategies for using administrative data is an integral part of every working day. As statistical methodologists, the three authors were drawn into these discussions. Like most methodologists, the authors see surveys and the publications of their results as a process where estimation is the key tool to achieve the final goal of an accurate statistical output. Randomness and sampling exists to support this goal, and early on it was clear to us that the incoming it-is-what-it-is data sources were not randomly selected. These sources were obviously biased and thus would produce biased estimates. So, we set out to design a strategy to deal with this issue. This led us to the concept of representativeness which is closely related to statistical bias but has a wider context invoking both randomness and judgement. The representativeness issue was the principal question that we set out to answer. The necessary components that we gathered for our solution are summarized in the paper. Keywords: Representativeness, Timeline Databases, Statistical Registers, Estimation

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.