Pith. Sign in

RECORD

A Real-Time Game Theoretic Planner for Autonomous Two-Player Drone Racing

Robotics · Submitted 8 Jan 2018

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim We demonstrate that our solution effectively competes against alternative strategies in a large number of drone racing simulations.

how it is stated · asserted 1.00 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv ID1801.02302 (version 2)
Pith IDC4TD3ULU, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationDavide Falanga, Davide Scaramuzza, Eduardo Montijano, Eric Cristofalo, Mac Schwager, Riccardo Spica. "A Real-Time Game Theoretic Planner for Autonomous Two-Player Drone Racing." arXiv:1801.02302 (2018). https://pith.science/paper/C4TD3ULU
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13.0 via TypeSafe API, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 5,547 input tokens.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.11 · states limitation 0.09 · human participants 0.03 · controlled comparison 0.64 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.06 · compares with prior results 0.81 · mentions code or data availability 0.03.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v2. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

To be successful in multi-player drone racing, a player must not only follow the race track in an optimal way, but also compete with other drones through strategic blocking, faking, and opportunistic passing while avoiding collisions. Since unveiling one's own strategy to the adversaries is not desirable, this requires each player to independently predict the other players' future actions. Nash equilibria are a powerful tool to model this and similar multi-agent coordination problems in which the absence of communication impedes full coordination between the agents. In this paper, we propose a novel receding horizon planning algorithm that, exploiting sensitivity analysis within an iterated best response computational scheme, can approximate Nash equilibria in real time. We also describe a vision-based pipeline that allows each player to estimate its opponent's relative position. We demonstrate that our solution effectively competes against alternative strategies in a large number of drone racing simulations. Hardware experiments with onboard vision sensing prove the practicality of our strategy.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 To be successful in multi-player drone racing, a player must not only follow the race track in an optimal way, but also compete with other drones through strategic blocking, faking, and opportunistic passing while avoiding collisions. background 1.00 0.06 0.03 asserted 1.00
s1 Since unveiling one's own strategy to the adversaries is not desirable, this requires each player to independently predict the other players' future actions. background 0.99 0.07 0.03 asserted 0.99
s2 Nash equilibria are a powerful tool to model this and similar multi-agent coordination problems in which the absence of communication impedes full coordination between the agents. background 0.99 0.06 0.04 asserted 1.00
s3 In this paper, we propose a novel receding horizon planning algorithm that, exploiting sensitivity analysis within an iterated best response computational scheme, can approximate Nash equilibria in real time. contribution 0.62 0.95 0.34 asserted 0.96
s4 We also describe a vision-based pipeline that allows each player to estimate its opponent's relative position. method 0.85 0.94 0.04 asserted 0.99
s5 We demonstrate that our solution effectively competes against alternative strategies in a large number of drone racing simulations. result 0.99 0.96 0.43 asserted 1.00
s6 Hardware experiments with onboard vision sensing prove the practicality of our strategy. result 0.95 0.96 0.22 asserted 1.00

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: method or tool 1.00 · evidence from simulation or computation 0.73.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v2
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

To be successful in multi-player drone racing, a player must not only follow the race track in an optimal way, but also compete with other drones through strategic blocking, faking, and opportunistic passing while avoiding collisions. Since unveiling one's own strategy to the adversaries is not desirable, this requires each player to independently predict the other players' future actions. Nash equilibria are a powerful tool to model this and similar multi-agent coordination problems in which the absence of communication impedes full coordination between the agents. In this paper, we propose a novel receding horizon planning algorithm that, exploiting sensitivity analysis within an iterated best response computational scheme, can approximate Nash equilibria in real time. We also describe a vision-based pipeline that allows each player to estimate its opponent's relative position. We demonstrate that our solution effectively competes against alternative strategies in a large number of drone racing simulations. Hardware experiments with onboard vision sensing prove the practicality of our strategy.

Human review
How the literature uses it

6 arXiv papers cite this in 12 sentences

Each citing sentence is taken from the citing paper's LaTeX source and typed by Pith's classifier. A label appears at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more; the quoted words are the citing authors'. How each label was checked · JSON

Papers citing it · 8 sentences without a confident label

Cites it as background 2 papers

What it cites

Compares with 1 paper
  • However, while in our work these behaviors naturally emerge from the use of sensitivity analysis, in [ref] these are hardcoded in the cost function optimized by the players.

    A Non-Cooperative Game Approach to Autonomous Racing · Game theoretic control using a Nash information pattern · 1.00

Cites as background 1 paper

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.