A Formalization of Kant's Second Formulation of the Categorical Imperative
read the original abstract
We present a formalization and computational implementation of the second formulation of Kant's categorical imperative. This ethical principle requires an agent to never treat someone merely as a means but always also as an end. Here we interpret this principle in terms of how persons are causally affected by actions. We introduce Kantian causal agency models in which moral patients, actions, goals, and causal influence are represented, and we show how to formalize several readings of Kant's categorical imperative that correspond to Kant's concept of strict and wide duties towards oneself and others. Stricter versions handle cases where an action directly causally affects oneself or others, whereas the wide version maximizes the number of persons being treated as an end. We discuss limitations of our formalization by pointing to one of Kant's cases that the machinery cannot handle in a satisfying way.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Addressing Moral Uncertainty using Large Language Models for Ethical Decision-Making
A reinforcement learning model is ethically fine-tuned using aggregated feedback from LLMs embodying five moral principles via Belief Jensen-Shannon Divergence and Dempster-Shafer Theory.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.