REVIEW 2 cited by
Explicit Inductive Bias for Transfer Learning with Convolutional Networks
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
abstract
In inductive transfer learning, fine-tuning pre-trained convolutional networks substantially outperforms training from scratch. When using fine-tuning, the underlying assumption is that the pre-trained model extracts generic features, which are at least partially relevant for solving the target task, but would be difficult to extract from the limited amount of data available on the target task. However, besides the initialization with the pre-trained model and the early stopping, there is no mechanism in fine-tuning for retaining the features learned on the source task. In this paper, we investigate several regularization schemes that explicitly promote the similarity of the final solution with the initial model. We show the benefit of having an explicit inductive bias towards the initial model, and we eventually recommend a simple $L^2$ penalty with the pre-trained model being a reference as the baseline of penalty for transfer learning tasks.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
MoEcho: Exploiting Side-Channel Attacks to Compromise User Privacy in Mixture-of-Experts LLMs
MoEcho claims to compromise user privacy in MoE LLMs and VLMs via four CPU and GPU side channels, but the provided manuscript body contains no supporting content.
-
Real-TabPFN: Improving Tabular Foundation Models via Continued Pre-training With Real-World Data
Continuing the pre-training of TabPFN on 71 curated real-world tables raises its average normalized ROC-AUC from 0.954 to 0.976 on 29 AutoML Benchmark datasets.
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.